Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304376›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2019

Automation of the kidney function prediction and classification through ultrasound-based kidney imaging using deep learning.

Chin-Chi Kuo, Chun-Min Chang, Kuan-Ting Liu, Wei-Kai Lin, Hsiu-Yin Chiang, Chih-Wei Chung, Meng-Ru Ho, Pei-Ran Sun, Rong-Lin Yang, Kuan-Ta Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 222 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chin-Chi KuoBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-2050-1377
Chun-Min Chang3Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kuan-Ting Liu3Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taichung, Taiwan.
Wei-Kai Lin3Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taichung, Taiwan.
Hsiu-Yin ChiangBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chih-Wei ChungBig Data Center, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Meng-Ru Ho3Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taichung, Taiwan.
Pei-Ran SunInformation Office, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Rong-Lin YangInformation Office, China Medical University Hospital, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Kuan-Ta Chen3Institute of Information Science, Academia Sinica, Taichung, Taiwan.
China Medical University · TWInstitute of Information Science, Academia Sinica · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction of kidney function and chronic kidney disease (CKD) through kidney ultrasound imaging has long been considered desirable in clinical practice because of its safety, convenience, and affordability. However, this highly desirable approach is beyond the capability of human vision. We developed a deep learning approach for automatically determining the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and CKD status. We exploited the transfer learning technique, integrating the powerful ResNet model pretrained on an ImageNet dataset in our neural network architecture, to predict kidney function based on 4,505 kidney ultrasound images labeled using eGFRs derived from serum creatinine concentrations. To further extract the information from ultrasound images, we leveraged kidney length annotations to remove the peripheral region of the kidneys and applied various data augmentation schemes to produce additional data with variations. Bootstrap aggregation was also applied to avoid overfitting and improve the model's generalization. Moreover, the kidney function features obtained by our deep neural network were used to identify the CKD status defined by an eGFR of <60 ml/min/1.73 m

Indexed as

EpidemiologyOutcomes researchUltrasonography

Identifiers

PMID31304376
PMCPMC6550224
OpenAlexW2941964694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.