ArticleNPJ digital medicine2019
Predicting scheduled hospital attendance with artificial intelligence.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exploring trends and autonomy levels of adaptive business intelligence in healthcare: A systematic review.PloS one · 2024Pooled it
- Neural networks for classification of cervical vertebrae maturation: a systematic review.The Angle orthodontist · 2022Pooled it
- Identifying Patients at High Risk of Lapses in Diabetic Retinopathy Care: A Machine Learning Study.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Perspectives on healthcare artificial intelligence policy from health equity professionals: findings from an interview study.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Deep phenotyping of patient lived experience in functional bowel disorders using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Governing the Unbound: SCAI's Role in the Future of Artificial Intelligence.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Predicting no-shows at outpatient appointments in internal medicine using machine learning models.PeerJ. Computer science · 2025Article
- Modeling the impact of social determinants on breast cancer screening: a data-driven approach.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Enhancing Health Equity by Predicting Missed Appointments in Health Care: Machine Learning Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Causes of Patient Nonattendance at Medical Appointments: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in radiology.The British journal of radiology · 2023Review
- COmic: convolutional kernel networks for interpretable end-to-end learning on (multi-)omics data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Predicting no-show appointments in a pediatric hospital in Chile using machine learning.Health care management science · 2023Article
- The promise and limitations of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal imaging.Frontiers in radiology · 2023Review
- Neural Network Detection of Pacemakers for MRI Safety.Journal of digital imaging · 2022Article
- Digital healthcare: the future.Future healthcare journal · 2022Article
- Feasibility and Assessment of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Outcome After Lumbar Decompression Surgery.Global spine journal · 2022Article
- Forecasting of Daily Outpatient Visits Based on Genetic Programming.Iranian journal of public health · 2022Article
- Reframing research impact.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Failure to attend scheduled hospital appointments disrupts clinical management and consumes resource estimated at £1 billion annually in the United Kingdom National Health Service alone. Accurate stratification of absence risk can maximize the yield of preventative interventions. The wide multiplicity of potential causes, and the poor performance of systems based on simple, linear, low-dimensional models, suggests complex predictive models of attendance are needed. Here, we quantify the effect of using complex, non-linear, high-dimensional models enabled by machine learning. Models systematically varying in complexity based on logistic regression, support vector machines, random forests, AdaBoost, or gradient boosting machines were trained and evaluated on an unselected set of 22,318 consecutive scheduled magnetic resonance imaging appointments at two UCL hospitals. High-dimensional Gradient Boosting Machine-based models achieved the best performance reported in the literature, exhibiting an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.852 and average precision of 0.511. Optimal predictive performance required 81 variables. Simulations showed net potential benefit across a wide range of attendance characteristics, peaking at £3.15 per appointment at current prevalence and call efficiency. Optimal attendance prediction requires more complex models than have hitherto been applied in the field, reflecting the complex interplay of patient, environmental, and operational causal factors. Far from an exotic luxury, high-dimensional models based on machine learning are likely essential to optimal scheduling amongst other operational aspects of hospital care. High predictive performance is achievable with data from a single institution, obviating the need for aggregating large-scale sensitive data across governance boundaries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.