Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304314›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2018

Exploratory study examining the at-home feasibility of a wearable tool for social-affective learning in children with autism.

Jena Daniels, Jessey N Schwartz, Catalin Voss, Nick Haber, Azar Fazel, Aaron Kline, Peter Washington, Carl Feinstein, Terry Winograd, Dennis P Wall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Session Introduction: TOWARDS ETHICAL BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS: LEARNING FROM OLELO NOEAU, HAWAIIAN PROVERBS.Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jena Daniels1Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7912-8482
Jessey N Schwartz1Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Catalin Voss2Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Nick Haber1Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Azar Fazel1Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Aaron Kline1Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Peter Washington2Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Carl Feinstein3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Terry Winograd2Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.
Dennis P Wall1Division of Systems Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7889-9146

Funding

Creating an artificial intelligence therapy-to-data feedback loop for child developmental healthcareR01LM013083 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WALL, DENNIS PAUL · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
QuBBD: Wearable artificial intelligence for bid data-driven healthcare in child development R01EB025025 · NIBIB · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WALL, DENNIS PAUL · 2017 to 2019
$1.1M
Evaluation of machine learning to mobilize detection and therapy of developmental delay in childrenR21HD091500 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WALL, DENNIS PAUL · 2017 to 2018
$432k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB025025NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD091500NLM NIH HHS R01 LM013083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although standard behavioral interventions for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are effective therapies for social deficits, they face criticism for being time-intensive and overdependent on specialists. Earlier starting age of therapy is a strong predictor of later success, but waitlists for therapies can be 18 months long. To address these complications, we developed Superpower Glass, a machine-learning-assisted software system that runs on Google Glass and an Android smartphone, designed for use during social interactions. This pilot exploratory study examines our prototype tool's potential for social-affective learning for children with autism. We sent our tool home with 14 families and assessed changes from intake to conclusion through the Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2), a facial affect recognition task (EGG), and qualitative parent reports. A repeated-measures one-way ANOVA demonstrated a decrease in SRS-2 total scores by an average 7.14 points (

Indexed as

Autism spectrum disordersEmpathySocial behaviourTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID31304314
PMCPMC6550272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.