Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304302›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2018

Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records.

Alvin Rajkomar, Eyal Oren, Kai Chen, Andrew M Dai, Nissan Hajaj, Michaela Hardt, Peter J Liu, Xiaobing Liu, Jake Marcus, Mimi Sun and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1,017 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1,017citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1,017 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Artificial intelligence catalyzes antimicrobial peptide design.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2027
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Global burden of subarachnoid hemorrhage in young adults, 1990-2021: disparities, risk factors, and projections to 2050.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

957 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Alvin Rajkomar *1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5750-5016
Eyal Oren *1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Kai Chen1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Andrew M Dai1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Nissan Hajaj1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Michaela Hardt1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Peter J Liu1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Xiaobing Liu1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Jake Marcus1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Mimi Sun1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Patrik Sundberg1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Hector Yee1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Kun Zhang1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Yi Zhang1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Gerardo Flores1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Gavin E Duggan1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Jamie Irvine1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Quoc Le1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Kurt Litsch1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Alexander Mossin1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Justin Tansuwan1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
De Wang1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
James Wexler1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Jimbo Wilson1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Dana Ludwig2University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Samuel L Volchenboum3University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL USA.
Katherine Chou1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Michael Pearson1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Srinivasan Madabushi1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Nigam H Shah4Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.
Atul J Butte2University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA USA.
Michael D Howell1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Claire Cui1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Greg S Corrado1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.
Jeffrey Dean1Google Inc, Mountain View, CA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive modeling with electronic health record (EHR) data is anticipated to drive personalized medicine and improve healthcare quality. Constructing predictive statistical models typically requires extraction of curated predictor variables from normalized EHR data, a labor-intensive process that discards the vast majority of information in each patient's record. We propose a representation of patients' entire raw EHR records based on the Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) format. We demonstrate that deep learning methods using this representation are capable of accurately predicting multiple medical events from multiple centers without site-specific data harmonization. We validated our approach using de-identified EHR data from two US academic medical centers with 216,221 adult patients hospitalized for at least 24 h. In the sequential format we propose, this volume of EHR data unrolled into a total of 46,864,534,945 data points, including clinical notes. Deep learning models achieved high accuracy for tasks such as predicting: in-hospital mortality (area under the receiver operator curve [AUROC] across sites 0.93-0.94), 30-day unplanned readmission (AUROC 0.75-0.76), prolonged length of stay (AUROC 0.85-0.86), and all of a patient's final discharge diagnoses (frequency-weighted AUROC 0.90). These models outperformed traditional, clinically-used predictive models in all cases. We believe that this approach can be used to create accurate and scalable predictions for a variety of clinical scenarios. In a case study of a particular prediction, we demonstrate that neural networks can be used to identify relevant information from the patient's chart.

Indexed as

Machine learningMedical research

Identifiers

PMID31304302
PMCPMC6550175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.