Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304272›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2018

FoodOn: a harmonized food ontology to increase global food traceability, quality control and data integration.

Damion M Dooley, Emma J Griffiths, Gurinder S Gosal, Pier L Buttigieg, Robert Hoehndorf, Matthew C Lange, Lynn M Schriml, Fiona S L Brinkman, William W L Hsiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 90 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
90citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

90 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exploring approaches to computational representation and classification of user-generated meal logs.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A fourfold pathogen reference ontology suite.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

30 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Damion M Dooley1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8844-9165
Emma J Griffiths2Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC Canada.
Gurinder S Gosal1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.
Pier L Buttigieg3Alfred-Wegener-Institut, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung, Bremen, Germany.
Robert Hoehndorf4King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Thuwal, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8149-5890
Matthew C Lange5Department of Food Science and Technology, UC Davis, Davis, CA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6148-7962
Lynn M Schriml6Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD USA.
Fiona S L Brinkman2Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC Canada.
William W L Hsiao1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-1342-4043

Funding

The Disease Ontology Project: mechanistic profiles of human disease for biomedical and clinical researchU41HG008735 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SCHRIML, LYNN MARIE · 2017 to 2021
$3.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U41 HG008735
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The construction of high capacity data sharing networks to support increasing government and commercial data exchange has highlighted a key roadblock: the content of existing Internet-connected information remains siloed due to a multiplicity of local languages and data dictionaries. This lack of a digital lingua franca is obvious in the domain of human food as materials travel from their wild or farm origin, through processing and distribution chains, to consumers. Well defined, hierarchical vocabulary, connected with logical relationships-in other words, an ontology-is urgently needed to help tackle data harmonization problems that span the domains of food security, safety, quality, production, distribution, and consumer health and convenience. FoodOn (http://foodon.org) is a consortium-driven project to build a comprehensive and easily accessible global farm-to-fork ontology about food, that accurately and consistently describes foods commonly known in cultures from around the world. FoodOn addresses food product terminology gaps and supports food traceability. Focusing on human and domesticated animal food description, FoodOn contains animal and plant food sources, food categories and products, and other facets like preservation processes, contact surfaces, and packaging. Much of FoodOn's vocabulary comes from transforming LanguaL, a mature and popular food indexing thesaurus, into a World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) OWL Web Ontology Language-formatted vocabulary that provides system interoperability, quality control, and software-driven intelligence. FoodOn compliments other technologies facilitating food traceability, which is becoming critical in this age of increasing globalization of food networks.

Indexed as

AgricultureDiseasesEnvironmental economicsPlant sciencesSustainability

Identifiers

PMID31304272
PMCPMC6550238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.