ArticleNPJ science of food2018
Public perception of genetically-modified (GM) food: A Nationwide Chinese Consumer Study.
Article in NPJ science of food, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetically modified foods and human health: a comprehensive review and cross-national time-trend analysis.GM crops & food · 2026Review
- Understanding Consumer Acceptance of Genetically Modified Foods: A Theory of Planned Behavior-Brand Equity-Sociodemographic Interactions.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Enhancing the delivery and stability of lipid nanoparticle-dsRNA formulations in the RNAi-recalcitrant fall armyworm (Frontiers in insect science · 2026Article
- How labeling of genetically modified foods affects consumers' purchase intentions: a multi-contextual analysis.GM crops & food · 2025Article
- Public knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions toward genetically modified foods in Lebanon.GM crops & food · 2025Article
- Analysis of the public perception and acceptance of gene-editing technology and gene-edited agricultural products in South Korea.GM crops & food · 2025Article
- Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Dots and Their Effects on Crop Seed Germination and Seedling Growth.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Consumer Sensory Perceptions of Natural Ingredients: A Multi-Country Comparison.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Importance-Performance Map Analysis of the Drivers for the Acceptance of Genetically Modified Food with a Theory of Planned Behavior Groundwork.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Genetically modified organisms and sustainable development goals: A survey of Taiwanese public opinion.PloS one · 2025Article
- Enhancing quality and climate resilient traits in vegetatively propagated polyploids: transgenic and genome editing advancements, challenges and future directions.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- Rethinking progress: harmonizing the discourse on genetically modified crops.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Exploring cost reduction strategies for serum free media development.NPJ science of food · 2024Review
- Public perception of folate-biofortified genetically modified lettuce varieties in Brazil.Transgenic research · 2024Article
- Understanding the Factors Driving Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Gene-Edited Foods in China.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- HarnessingFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on consumers' perceptions of genetically modified food.GM crops & food · 2023Article
- Similarities and differences with the 'general public': Chinese civil servants' attitude to genetically modified organisms and its influencing factors.GM crops & food · 2023Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
After more than 25 years of research and development on the genetic modification of a wide range of crops for food and fodder, China has reached a decision point as to whether it should accept, reject, or go slow with the use of genetically modified (GM) technology to produce the food and feed needed to sustain its population growth and economic renaissance. Here, we report a consumer survey on GM food that includes input from all provinces in China. Chinese consumers were surveyed for their awareness, knowledge, and opinion on GM food. The survey resulted in 11.9, 41.4, and 46.7% of respondents having a positive, neutral, or negative view on GM food, respectively. A minority of respondents (11.7%) claimed they understood the basic principles of GM technology, while most were either "neutral" or "unfamiliar with GM technology". Most respondents (69.3%) obtained their information on GM food through the Internet and 64.3% of respondents thought that media coverage was predominately negative on GM food. The reasons given by consumers in favor of, or against, the use of GM food, were complex, as seen by the response of 13.8% of respondents who felt GM technology was a form of bioterrorism targeted at China. China's Ministry of Agriculture and the science community generally expressed a positive attitude toward GM food, but the percentage of respondents that trusted the government and scientists was only 11.7 and 23.2%, respectively. Post-survey comments of respondents made suggestions on how the industrialization of GM technology might impact the future of China's food supply and value chains. Finally, the impact of emerging technologies like genome editing and genome-edited organisms (GEOs) on the GM food debate is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.