Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31304244›Full record

ReviewNPJ science of food2017

Impact of diet-derived signaling molecules on human cognition: exploring the food-brain axis.

Raymond L Rodriguez, John G Albeck, Ameer Y Taha, Kassandra M Ori-McKenney, Gregg H Recanzone, Tyler W Stradleigh, Bronte C Hernandez, Feng-Yao Vincent Tang, En-Pei Isabel Chiang, Lillian Cruz-Orengo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ science of food, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Gut microbiota, nutrition, and mental health.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Brain on food: The neuroepigenetics of nutrition.Neurochemistry international · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Raymond L Rodriguez1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6105-2571
John G Albeck1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Ameer Y Taha2Department of Food Science and Technology, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Kassandra M Ori-McKenney1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Gregg H Recanzone3Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Tyler W Stradleigh3Department of Neurobiology, Physiology and Behavior, College of Biological Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Bronte C Hernandez1Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Biological Sciences, One Shields Avenue, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.
Feng-Yao Vincent Tang6Department of Nutrition, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.
En-Pei Isabel Chiang7Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Lillian Cruz-Orengo9Department of Anatomy, Physiology & Cell Biology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The processes that define mammalian physiology evolved millions of years ago in response to ancient signaling molecules, most of which were acquired by ingestion and digestion. In this way, evolution inextricably linked diet to all major physiological systems including the nervous system. The importance of diet in neurological development is well documented, although the mechanisms by which diet-derived signaling molecules (DSMs) affect cognition are poorly understood. Studies on the positive impact of nutritive and non-nutritive bioactive molecules on brain function are encouraging but lack the statistical power needed to demonstrate strong positive associations. Establishing associations between DSMs and cognitive functions like mood, memory and learning are made even more difficult by the lack of robust phenotypic markers that can be used to accurately and reproducibly measure the effects of DSMs. Lastly, it is now apparent that processes like neurogenesis and neuroplasticity are embedded within layers of interlocked signaling pathways and gene regulatory networks. Within these interdependent pathways and networks, the various transducers of DSMs are used combinatorially to produce those emergent adaptive gene expression responses needed for stimulus-induced neurogenesis and neuroplasticity. Taken together, it appears that cognition is encoded genomically and modified by epigenetics and epitranscriptomics to produce complex transcriptional programs that are exquisitely sensitive to signaling molecules from the environment. Models for how DSMs mediate the interplay between the environment and various neuronal processes are discussed in the context of the food-brain axis.

Indexed as

Dendritic excitabilityNeuroscienceSystems biology

Identifiers

PMID31304244
PMCPMC6548416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.