ArticleRegenerative therapy2019
Analysis of human nasal mucosal cell sheets fabricated using transported tissue and blood specimens.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term outcomes of middle ear regenerative therapy using cell sheet transplantation combined with tympanoplasty.Regenerative therapy · 2026Article
- Analysis of the potential of human cultured nasal epithelial cell sheets to differentiate into airway epithelium.FASEB bioAdvances · 2023Article
- Lipocalin 15 in the olfactory mucus is a biomarker for Bowman's gland activity.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Temporary Storage of the Human Nasal Tissue and Cell Sheet for Wound Repair.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021Article
- ROCK inhibitor combined with CaScientific reports · 2020Article
- Viability evaluation of layered cell sheets after ultraviolet light irradiation of 222 nm.Regenerative therapy · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Previously, we succeeded in transplanting autologous nasal mucosal cell sheets in the middle ears of 5 patients, who underwent cholesteatoma resection, which prevents recurrence of cholesteatoma in clinical settings. Current good manufacturing practice (GMP) standards for human cell cultivation requires the establishment of cell processing centers (CPC) which act as germ-free facilities. However, due to practical difficulties involved in establishing and maintaining such facilities at each individual hospital, a functional transport system is felt to be needed for the continuation of effective regenerative therapy. In the current study, nasal mucosal tissue and autologous blood obtained from 3 human volunteers were transported for over 3 h. Disinfected nasal tissues were cultured using keratinocyte culture medium, which included autologous serum prepared from blood. After 24 d, cultured nasal mucosal cells were transported for over 3 h and subsequently assessed for cell number, viability and purity. Moreover, CK4, CK8, and CK18 were analyzed the suitability of these nasal mucosal cell sheets for middle ear regenerative therapy. Overall, we confirmed that nasal mucosal cell sheets can be fabricated using transported nasal mucosal tissue and blood. This study would be contribute to establish a new regenerative therapy for clinical application, accompanied with transportation between companies and hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.