Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31303974›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2019

Interfaces Between Alpha-helical Integral Membrane Proteins: Characterization, Prediction, and Docking.

Bian Li, Jeffrey Mendenhall, Jens Meiler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. MENSAdb: a thorough structural analysis of membrane protein dimers.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2021
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bian LiDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Jeffrey MendenhallDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Jens MeilerDepartment of Chemistry and Center for Structural Biology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.

Funding

Translational Analysis CoreP30DK058404 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI RICHARD M. PEEK · 2002 to 2026
$29.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK058404
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) is an essential mechanism by which proteins perform their biological functions. For globular proteins, the molecular characteristics of such interactions have been well analyzed, and many computational tools are available for predicting PPI sites and constructing structural models of the complex. In contrast, little is known about the molecular features of the interaction between integral membrane proteins (IMPs) and few methods exist for constructing structural models of their complexes. Here, we analyze the interfaces from a non-redundant set of complexes of α-helical IMPs whose structures have been determined to a high resolution. We find that the interface is not significantly different from the rest of the surface in terms of average hydrophobicity. However, the interface is significantly better conserved and, on average, inter-subunit contacting residue pairs correlate more strongly than non-contacting pairs, especially in obligate complexes. We also develop a neural network-based method, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75 and a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.70, for predicting interface residues and their weighted contact numbers (WCNs). We further show that predicted interface residues and their WCNs can be used as restraints to reconstruct the structure α-helical IMP dimers through docking for fourteen out of a benchmark set of sixteen complexes. The RMSD100 values of the best-docked ligand subunit to its native structure are <2.5 Å for these fourteen cases. The structural analysis conducted in this work provides molecular details about the interface between α-helical IMPs and the WCN restraints represent an efficient means to score α-helical IMP docking candidates.

Indexed as

AUC, Area under the ROC curveIMP, Integral membrane proteinMAE, Mean absolute errorMembrane protein dockingMembrane protein interfacesMSA, Multiple sequence alignmentNeural networksOPM, Orientations of proteins in membranesPCC, Pearson correlation coefficientPDB, Protein data bankPPI, Protein-protein interactionPPM, Positioning of proteins in membrane.PPV, Positive predictive valuePSSM, Position-specific scoring matrixRMSD, Root-mean-square distanceROC, Receiver operating characteristic curveRSA, Relative solvent accessibilityTNR, True negative rateTPR, True positive rateWCN, Weighted contact numberWeighted contact numbers

Identifiers

PMID31303974
PMCPMC6603304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.