Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31303926›Full record

ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2019

Individualized dosing of oral propranolol for treatment of infantile hemangioma: a prospective study.

Arun Prasad, Amit Kumar Sinha, Bindey Kumar, Abhiranjan Prasad, Manju Kumari

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Arun PrasadDepartment of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Amit Kumar SinhaDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Bindey KumarDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, India.
Abhiranjan PrasadDepartment of General Surgery, Anugrah Narayan Magadh Medical College, Gaya, India.
Manju KumariDepartment of Pharmacology, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College, Bhagalpur, India.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductioninfantile hemangioma is the most common benign tumor in infancy. Currently, oral propranolol is the treatment of choice for infantile hemangioma, but there is no consensus when it comes to its recommended dosage for this condition. Hence this study was conducted to find out the appropriate dosage of oral propranolol for treatment of infantile hemangioma.

methodsA prospective study was conducted on 25 patients with infantile hemangioma, who were treated with gradually increasing dose of propranolol starting from a lower dose of 1mg/kg/day.

results17/22(76%) patients showed regression of the tumor at the dose of 1- 1.5 mg/kg/d. 5/22(24%) patients were unresponsive to the treatment with the lower dose and they did not respond even with the gradually escalated dose of 3-4 mg/kg/day.

conclusionPropranolol in a lower dose of 1-1.5 mg/kg/day is safe and efficacious in the treatment of infantile hemangioma and the lesions which do not show initial response to the lower dose are unlikely to respond to the higher dose of 3-4 mg/kg/day.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsChild, PreschoolDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHemangiomaHumansInfantMalePropranololProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsPropranololdoseInfantile hemangiomapropranololside effects

Identifiers

PMID31303926
PMCPMC6607273
OpenAlexW3023496000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.