Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31303899›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2019

Economic burden of diabetes in Brazil in 2014.

Luciana Ribeiro Bahia, Michelle Quarti Machado da Rosa, Denizar Vianna Araujo, Marcelo Goulart Correia, Roger Dos Santos Dos Rosa, Bruce Bartholow Duncan, Cristiana Maria Toscano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Productivity Losses Due to Diabetes in Urban Rural China.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose as an Integral Part in the Management of People with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Luciana Ribeiro Bahia1Internal Medicine Department, Institute for Health Technology Assessment, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77-Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20551-030 Brazil.
Michelle Quarti Machado da Rosa1Internal Medicine Department, Institute for Health Technology Assessment, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77-Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20551-030 Brazil.
Denizar Vianna Araujo1Internal Medicine Department, Institute for Health Technology Assessment, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Boulevard 28 de Setembro, 77-Vila Isabel, Rio de Janeiro, RJ 20551-030 Brazil.
Marcelo Goulart Correia2Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Department, National Institute of Cardiology, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Roger Dos Santos Dos Rosa3Social Medicine Department, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Bruce Bartholow Duncan4Graduate Studies Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Cristiana Maria ToscanoCollective Health Department, Institute for Health Technology Assessment, Federal University of Goiânia, Goiânia, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetes and its complications produce significant clinical, economic and social impact. The knowledge of the costs of diabetes generates subsidies to maintain the financial sustainability of public health and social security systems, guiding research and health care priorities.

aimsThe aim of this study was to estimate the economic burden of diabetes in Brazilian adults in 2014, considering the perspectives of the public health care system and the society.

methodsA prevalence-based approach was used to estimate the annual health resource utilization and costs attributable to diabetes and related conditions. The healthcare system perspective considered direct medical costs related to outpatient and hospitalization costs. The societal perspective considered non-medical (transportation and dietary products) and indirect costs (productivity loss, disability, and premature retirement). Outpatient costs included medicines, health professional visits, exams, home glucose monitoring, ophthalmic procedures, and costs related to end stage renal disease. The costs of hospitalization attributed to diabetes related conditions were estimated using attributable risk methodology. Costs were estimated in Brazilian currency, and then converted to international dollars (2014).

resultsBased on a national self-reported prevalence of 6.2%, the total cost of diabetes in 2014 was Int$ 15.67 billion, including Int$ 6.89 billion in direct medical costs (44%), Int$ 3.69 billion in non-medical costs (23.6%) and Int$ 5.07 billion in indirect costs (32.4%). Outpatient costs summed Int$ 6.62 billion and the costs of 314,334 hospitalizations attributed to diabetes and related conditions was Int$ 264.9 million. Most hospitalizations were due to cardiovascular diseases (47.9%), followed by diabetes itself (18%), and renal diseases (13.6%). Diet and transportation costs were estimated at Int$ 3.2 billion and Int$ 462.3 million, respectively.

conclusionsOur results showed a substantial economic burden of diabetes in Brazil, and most likely are underrated as they are based on an underestimated prevalence of diabetes. Healthcare policies aiming at diabetes prevention and control are urgently sought.

Indexed as

Cost analysisCost studiesPublic healthType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID31303899
PMCPMC6604164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.