ArticleSaudi journal of biological sciences2019
Metabonomics of mice intestine in
Article in Saudi journal of biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Monascuspiloin fromFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Circulating Tumor Cell and Metabolites as Novel Biomarkers for Early-Stage Lung Cancer Diagnosis.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intestinal cancer is a disease with high morbidity and high mortality in China. Previous studies have shown that Codonopsis foetens can inhibit cellular autophagy and promote the apoptosis of intestine cancer cells. Based on metabolomics method coupled with liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) technology, we aimed to analyze intestinal small molecule metabolites in the intestinal cancer model group and the Codonopsis foetens treated group. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS-DA) were used to identify the pattern of the data. And the metabolic characteristics of the cancer model group were explored based on the metabolic differences between the groups. Multivariate statistical analysis revealed that metabolites presented with differences included: Acetamide, Phosphoric acid, Hydrogen sulfite, Pyruvic acid, Cytosine, 2-Hydroxypyridine, Phosphoric acid, Uracil, Gamma-Aminobutyric acid, Glycerol alpha-monochlorohydrin, Thiosulfic acid, L-Valine, Cysteamine, Taurine, Creatine, Homocysteine, Hypoxanthine, Se-Methylselenocysteine, 5-Hydroxymethyluracil, Oxoglutaric acid, LysoPC(20:0), LysoPC(22:4(7Z,10Z,13Z,16Z)), LysoPC(18:2(9Z,12Z)), LysoPC(16:1(9Z)), LysoPE(0:0/16:0), LysoPE(0:0/18:2(9Z,12Z)), LysoPE(18:0/0:0), LysoPE(20:1(11Z)/0:0), etc. Combined with metabolic pathway analysis, pathways presented with differences included: Citrate cycle (TCA cycle), ABC transporters, 2-Oxocarboxylic acid metabolism, Taurine and hypotaurine metabolism, Butanoate metabolism), Phenylalanine, tyrosine and tryptophan biosynthesis, Biosynthesis of amino acids, Protein digestion and absorption, Aminoacyl-tRNA biosynthesis, C5-Branched dibasic acid metabolism, GABAergic synapse, Proximal tubule bicarbonate reclamation, Mineral absorption, Phenylalanine metabolism. The results showed that the proliferation of intestinal cancer cells caused cell metabolism disorders, manifesting as changes in metabolic pathways and resulting in changes in metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.