ArticleChildren and youth services review2019
Is the focus of community-based mental health treatment consistent with adolescent psychiatric diagnoses?
Article in Children and youth services review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Most adolescents do not receive effective mental health services. This may stem in part from infrequent use of evidence-based and multi-informant diagnostic assessments to guide clinical care. The primary purpose of the present study was to examine whether adolescent mental health diagnoses and suicidality, derived via evidence-based diagnostic interviews and assessments, correspond with reported "reason for treatment" received by adolescents. Secondarily, we examined the potential association between socio-economic status and the match between youth diagnoses and reasons for treatment. The influence of parent-adolescent agreement on diagnoses and reasons for treatment on findings was also explored. Using chi-square analyses, a significant association was found between youth diagnoses of mood disorders, disruptive behavior disorders, and suicidality, respectively, and a focus of treatment on these conditions per combined parent-adolescent report. The same was not true for youth anxiety, attention-deficit hyperactivity, or substance abuse disorders. Results of exploratory analyses suggest that these results are driven by adolescent, but not parent report. With regard to socio-economic status, there was a trend for those with higher incomes to report a treatment focus consistent with youth diagnoses, per combined parent-adolescent report. Results suggest that focus of mental health treatment received by adolescents in standard community-based care may not uniformly address all current disorders. Efforts are needed to disseminate multi-informant evidence-based assessments to enhance the quality and effectiveness of care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.