ArticleCurrent opinion in microbiology2019
Corrigendum to "RiPP antibiotics: biosynthesis and engineering potential" [Curr Opin Microbiol 45 (2018) 61-69].
Article in Current opinion in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diverse biosynthetic pathways in Arctic hydrothermal biofilms.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Characterizing and engineering post-translational modifications with high-throughput cell-free expression.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Lipidated variants of the antimicrobial peptide nisin produced via incorporation of methionine analogs for click chemistry show improved bioactivity.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2023Article
- Identification of a poly-cyclopropylglycine-containing peptide via bioinformatic mapping of radical S-adenosylmethionine enzymes.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2022Article
- Substrate specificity of the cypemycin decarboxylase CypD.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2018Review
- Activation of microbial secondary metabolic pathways: Avenues and challenges.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
31303539What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.