Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31303499›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2019

Epigenetic inhibitor zebularine activates ear pinna wound closure in the mouse.

Piotr Sass, Paweł Sosnowski, Justyna Podolak-Popinigis, Bartosz Górnikiewicz, Jolanta Kamińska, Milena Deptuła, Ewa Nowicka, Anna Wardowska, Jarosław Ruczyński, Piotr Rekowski and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Decoding the Human Epidermal Complexity at Single-Cell Resolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Piotr SassLaboratory for Regenerative Biotechnology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Paweł SosnowskiLaboratory for Regenerative Biotechnology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Justyna Podolak-PopinigisLaboratory for Regenerative Biotechnology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Bartosz GórnikiewiczLaboratory for Regenerative Biotechnology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Jolanta KamińskaLaboratory for Regenerative Biotechnology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland.
Milena DeptułaLaboratory of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Embryology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
Ewa NowickaDepartment of Clinical Anatomy, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
Anna WardowskaLaboratory of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Embryology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
Jarosław RuczyńskiDepartment of Molecular Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Piotr RekowskiDepartment of Molecular Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Piotr RogujskiLaboratory of Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Natalia FilipowiczFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-416, Poland.
Alina MieczkowskaFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-416, Poland.
Grażyna Peszyńska-SularzTri-City Academic Laboratory Animal Centre, Research and Services Centre, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland.
Łukasz JanusMedVentures Institute, 60-141 Poznań, Poland.
Piotr SkowronDepartment of Molecular Biotechnology, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.
Artur CzuprynLaboratory of Neurobiology, Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-093 Warsaw, Poland.
Piotr MuchaDepartment of Molecular Biochemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
Arkadiusz PiotrowskiFaculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk 80-416, Poland.
Sylwia Rodziewicz-MotowidłoDepartment of Biomedicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdańsk, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland.
Michał PikułaLaboratory of Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine, Department of Embryology, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-211 Gdańsk, Poland. Electronic address: pikula@gumed.edu.pl.
Paweł SachadynLaboratory for Regenerative Biotechnology, Gdańsk University of Technology, 80-233 Gdańsk, Poland. Electronic address: psach@pg.edu.pl.
Gdańsk Medical University · PLGdańsk University of Technology · PLUniversity of Gdańsk · PLInstytut Biologii Doświadczalnej im. Marcelego Nenckiego · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMost studies on regenerative medicine focus on cell-based therapies and transplantations. Small-molecule therapeutics, though proved effective in different medical conditions, have not been extensively investigated in regenerative research. It is known that healing potential decreases with development and developmental changes are driven by epigenetic mechanisms, which suggests epigenetic repression of regenerative capacity.

methodsWe applied zebularine, a nucleoside inhibitor of DNA methyltransferases, to stimulate the regenerative response in a model of ear pinna injury in mice.

findingsWe observed the regeneration of complex tissue that was manifested as improved ear hole repair in mice that received intraperitoneal injections of zebularine. Six weeks after injury, the mean hole area decreased by 83.2 ± 9.4% in zebularine-treated and by 43.6 ± 15.4% in control mice (p < 10

interpretationThis study is the first to demonstrate an effective induction of complex tissue regeneration in adult mammals using zebularine. We showed that the synergistic action of an epigenetic drug (zebularine) and a transcriptional activator (retinoic acid) could be effectively utilized to induce the regenerative response, thus delineating a novel pharmacological strategy for regeneration. The strategy was effective in the model of ear pinna regeneration in mice, but zebularine acts on different cell types, therefore, a similar approach can be tested in other tissues and organs.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomarkersCell ProliferationCpG IslandsCytidineDNA MethylationEar AuricleEpigenesis, GeneticKeratinocytesMiceRegenerative MedicineTretinoinWound HealingBiomarkersCytidinepyrimidin-2-one beta-ribofuranosideTretinoinEar pinnaEpigeneticsMouseRegenerationWound healing, regenerative medicineZebularine

Identifiers

PMID31303499
PMCPMC6710911
OpenAlexW2961528267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.