Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31303258›Full record

ArticleEuropean urology2019

Incremental Utility of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer: Quantifying the Relapse Risk Associated with Therapeutic Effect.

Filippo Pederzoli, Marco Bandini, Alberto Briganti, Elizabeth R Plimack, Günter Niegisch, Evan Y Yu, Aristotelis Bamias, Neeraj Agarwal, Srikala S Sridhar, Cora N Sternberg and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European urology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 15 institutions in 6 countries.

Filippo PederzoliUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy. Electronic address: pederzoli.filippo@hsr.it.
Marco BandiniUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Alberto BrigantiUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Günter NiegischDepartment of Urology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Evan Y YuFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Aristotelis BamiasNational & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake, UT, USA.
Srikala S SridharCancer Clinical Research Unit, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.
Cora N SternbergEnglander Institute for Precision Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York-Presbyterian, New York, NY, USA.
Ulka N VaishampayanKarmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI, USA.
Christine ThéodoreHospital Foch, Suresnes, France.
Jonathan E RosenbergMemorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Lauren C HarshmanDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Joaquim BellmuntDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Matthew D GalskyTisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Andrea GallinaUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Andrea SaloniaUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Francesco MontorsiUnit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Andrea NecchiFondazione IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy.
RISC Investigators
IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITHarvard University · USVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITCornell University · USFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori · ITFox Chase Cancer Center · USHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEHôpital Foch · FRHuntsman Cancer Institute · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational and Kapodistrian University of Athens · GRThe Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USUniversity Health Network · CAUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Tumor Biology and Microenvironment (Program 1)P30CA022453 · NCI · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Julie Lynn Boerner · 1985 to 2026
$68.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P30 CA022453
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The availability of new potent systemic therapies for urothelial carcinoma may change the way we use standard chemotherapy perioperatively. In particular, identifying which patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is compelling. From a multicenter database we selected 950 patients with cT2-4N0M0 MIBC treated with radical cystectomy (RC), with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), and AC. We used Kaplan-Meier analyses to test 1-yr recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates according to AC use. Nomogram-derived probabilities of 1-yr recurrence after RC were plotted against actual recurrence rates according to AC use. Overall, we did not see evidence of an AC effect on the 1-yr RFS rate (p=0.6). Conversely, the 1-yr RFS rate was higher among patients with pT3-4 or pN1 disease who received AC (75% vs 54%; p<0.001). We were unable to demonstrate a difference between AC and no AC among patients who received prior NAC (1-yr RFS 57% vs 76%; p=0.057). As the most important finding, AC was associated with incremental RFS benefits only for patients with a nomogram-derived 1-yr recurrence probability of >40%. Patient summary: Maximizing disease control with adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer who had a calculated recurrence risk of >40% and did not impact cancer recurrence in lower-risk disease. Therefore, patient stratification using the nomogram available for predicting recurrence is advisable pending external validation.

Indexed as

AgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantHumansMiddle AgedMuscle NeoplasmsMuscle, SmoothNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAdjuvant chemotherapyImmunotherapyMuscle-invasive bladder cancerNomogramRecurrence-free survival

Identifiers

PMID31303258
PMCPMC6852645
OpenAlexW2959688418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.