Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31303170›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2019

The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals.

Siobhán M Mattison, Mary K Shenk, Melissa Emery Thompson, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder, Laura Fortunato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inheritance and inequality among nomads of South Siberia.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Gender disparities in material and educational resources differ by kinship system.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Lineal kinship organization in cross-specific perspective.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  11. The expendable male hypothesis.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  12. How can non-human primates inform evolutionary perspectives on female-biased kinship in humans?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siobhán M Mattison1 Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 , USA.
Mary K Shenk2 Department of Anthropology, Pennsylvania State University , University Park, PA 16802 , USA.
Melissa Emery Thompson1 Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131 , USA.
Monique Borgerhoff Mulder3 Department of Anthropology, University of California at Davis , Davis, CA 95616 , USA.
Laura Fortunato4 Department of Anthropology, Magdalen College, University of Oxford , Oxford, OX1 4AU , UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Female-biased kinship (FBK) arises in numerous species and in diverse human cultures, suggesting deep evolutionary roots to female-oriented social structures. The significance of FBK has been debated for centuries in human studies, where it has often been described as difficult to explain. At the same time, studies of FBK in non-human animals point to its apparent benefits for longevity, social complexity and reproduction. Are female-biased social systems evolutionarily stable and under what circumstances? What are the causes and consequences of FBK? The purpose of this theme issue is to consolidate efforts towards understanding the evolutionary significance and stability of FBK in humans and other mammals. The issue includes broad theoretical and empirical reviews as well as specific case studies addressing the social and ecological correlates of FBK across taxa, time and space. It leverages a comparative approach to test existing hypotheses and presents novel arguments that aim to expand our understanding of how males and females negotiate kinship across diverse contexts in ways that lead to the expression of female biases in kinship behaviour and social structure. This article is part of the theme issue 'The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals'.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionSocial BehaviorAnimalsFamily RelationsFemaleHumansMaleMammalsdescentinheritancekinshiplocalitymatrilinysex-bias

Identifiers

PMID31303170
PMCPMC6664133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.