Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302944›Full record

ArticleNeurourology and urodynamics2019

The misdiagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome in a VA population.

Stephanie L Skove, Lauren E Howard, Justin Senechal, Amanda De Hoedt, Catherine Bresee, Timothy J Cunningham, Kamil E Barbour, Jayoung Kim, Stephen J Freedland, Jennifer T Anger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Excluding confusable diseases in patients with presumptive diagnosis of interstitial cystitis: A large patient cohort study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Prevalence of Prurigo Nodularis in Poland.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2020
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stephanie L SkoveUrology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina.
Lauren E HowardUrology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina.
Justin SenechalUrology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina.
Amanda De HoedtUrology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina.
Catherine BreseeDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Timothy J CunninghamDivision of Population Health, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, California.
Kamil E BarbourDivision of Population Health, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, California.
Jayoung KimDepartment of Surgery and Biomedical Science, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.
Stephen J FreedlandUrology Section, Department of Surgery, Veterans Affairs Medical Centers, Durham, North Carolina.
Jennifer T AngerSamuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3897-5941

Funding

The Epidemiology of Interstitial Cystitis in a Nationwide Multiethnic VA CohortU01DP006079 · DP · CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER · PI ANGER, JENNIFER TASH, FREEDLAND, STEPHEN JAY · 2015 to 2019
$3.8M
ACL HHS U01DP006079NCCDPHP CDC HHS U01 DP006079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe complexity of Interstitial Cystitis/bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/BPS) has led to a great deal of uncertainty around the diagnosis and prevalence of the condition. Under the hypothesis that IC/BPS is frequently misdiagnosed, we sought to assess the accuracy of the ICD-9/ICD-10 code for IC/BPS using a national data set.

methodsUsing the Veterans Affairs Informatics and Computing Infrastructure, we identified a random sample of 100 patients with an ICD-9/ICD-10 diagnosis of IC/BPS (595.1/N30.10) by querying all living patients in the Veterans Affairs (VA) system. We purposely sampled men and women equally to better understand gender-specific practice patterns. Patients were considered a correct IC/BPS diagnosis if they had two visits complaining of bladder-centric pain in the absence of positive urine culture at least 6 weeks apart. Patients were considered not to have IC/BPS if they had a history of pelvic radiation, systemic chemotherapy, metastatic cancer, or bladder cancer.

resultsOf the 100 patients, 48 were female and 52 were male. Five had prior radiation, one had active cancer, and 10 had bladder cancer (all male), and an additional fifteen had insufficient records. Of the remaining 69 patients, 43% did not have IC/BPS. Of these patients who did not have IC/BPS, 43% complained only of overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms, which was more common in women (63%) than men (21%), P = .003.

conclusionsIn our small sample from a nationwide VA system, results indicate that IC/BPS has a high misdiagnosis rate. These findings shed light on the gender-specific diagnostic complexity of IC/BPS.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCystitis, InterstitialDiagnostic ErrorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPelvic PainUrinary Bladder, Overactiveclaims datadiagnosisepidemiologypainful bladderVeterans Affairs

Identifiers

PMID31302944
PMCPMC7169430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.