Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302896›Full record

ArticleDrug safety2019

Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation : Operational proposals for increasing the use of patient registries in regulatory assessments.

Patricia McGettigan, Carla Alonso Olmo, Kelly Plueschke, Mireia Castillon, Daniel Nogueras Zondag, Priya Bahri, Xavier Kurz, Peter G M Mol

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Eligibility for donanemab trial in a population-based study of cognitive aging.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Medicine Development and Access for Rare Diseases: Can We Do Better?Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. [Update of the Amputation Registry Germany (AMP-Registry)].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Patricia McGettiganWilliam Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, Charterhouse Square, London, EC1M 6BQ, United Kingdom. p.mcgettigan@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9757-9754
Carla Alonso OlmoPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Kelly PlueschkePharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Mireia CastillonPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Daniel Nogueras ZondagPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Priya BahriPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Xavier KurzPharmacovigilance and Epidemiology Department, European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Peter G M MolDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPatient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiative-led multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these.

resultsTen factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments.

conclusionsThese are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.

Indexed as

Drug ApprovalDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsRegistriesDatabases, FactualDecision MakingHumansMarketingProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID31302896
PMCPMC6834729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.