ArticleDrug safety2019
Patient Registries: An Underused Resource for Medicines Evaluation : Operational proposals for increasing the use of patient registries in regulatory assessments.
Article in Drug safety, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 58 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
58 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Congenital Myopathy.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2020Pooled it
- Eligibility for donanemab trial in a population-based study of cognitive aging.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Trial
- Real-World Data for Safety Studies: Challenges and Opportunities From the Italian Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders Register.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2026Article
- Circulating tumor DNA precision oncology enables effective and sensitive molecular diagnostics and actionable target detection in pediatric solid tumors - the INFORM experience.Genome medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Visual Outcomes Following Infectious Endophthalmitis from Intravitreal Injections of Biologic Drugs: An Intelligent Research in Sight Registry Retrospective Analysis.Ophthalmology and therapy · 2026Article
- Perspective on Better Access to Data and Data Integration in Pharmacovigilance: Information from a Focus Group.Drug safety · 2026Article
- Medicine Development and Access for Rare Diseases: Can We Do Better?Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Review
- Design, implementation and analysis of a quality assurance process for Informed Consents using the DZHK registry TORCH-DZHK1 as an example.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Opportunities and challenges in automated coding of electronic health records: a pilot study for rare disease registries.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Current status of antimicrobial resistance in Indian healthcare system: combating antimicrobial resistance with precision medicine.Frontiers in antibiotics · 2026Review
- Real-World Data Included in Post-authorisation Measures: A Case Study of Approved Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products in the European Union between 2013 and 2024.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2025Article
- Navigating the Real World: A Scoping Review of Structured Frameworks to Effectively Identify, Evaluate, and Select Real-World Data Sources for Fit-for-Purpose Studies.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Article
- Optimizing Patient Registries for Regulatory Decision Making - Key Learnings From an HMA/EMA Multistakeholder Workshop.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2025Review
- Criteria to evaluate unmet health-related needs of persons living with rare diseases and their caregivers: rapid literature review and stakeholder consultations.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Review
- Stakeholders' Perspectives Toward the Use of Patient Registry Data for Decision-Making on Medicines: A Cross-Sectional Survey.Drug safety · 2025Article
- Real-world datasets for the International Registry for Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias (InRAD) and other registries: An international consensus.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- [Update of the Amputation Registry Germany (AMP-Registry)].Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- siRNAs, tRNAs, and rRNAs in Osteoarthritis: Biological Functions and Therapeutic Opportunities.Biologics : targets & therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPatient registries, 'organised systems that use observational methods to collect uniform data on a population defined by a particular disease, condition, or exposure, and that is followed over time', are potentially valuable sources of data for supporting regulatory decision-making, especially for products to treat rare diseases. Nevertheless, patient registries are greatly underused in regulatory assessments. Reasons include heterogeneity in registry design and in the data collected, even across registries for the same disease, as well as unreliable data quality and data sharing impediments. The Patient Registries Initiative was established by the European Medicines Agency in 2015 to support registries in collecting data suitable to contribute to regulatory assessments, especially post-authorisation safety and effectiveness studies.
methodsWe conducted a qualitative synthesis of the published observations and recommendations from an initiative-led multi-stakeholder consultation and four disease-specific patient registry workshops. We identified the primary factors facilitating the use of registry data in regulatory assessments. We generated proposals on operational measures needed from stakeholders including registry holders, patients, healthcare professionals, regulators, marketing authorisation applicants and holders, and health technology assessment bodies for implementing these.
resultsTen factors were identified as facilitating registry use for supporting regulatory assessments of medicinal products. Proposals on operational measures needed for implementation were categorised according to three themes: (1) nature of the data collected and registry quality assurance processes; (2) registry governance, informed consent, data protection and sharing; and (3) stakeholder communication and planning of benefit-risk assessments.
conclusionsThese are the first explicit proposals, from a regulatory perspective, on operational methods for increasing the use of patient registries in medicines regulation. They apply to registry holders, patients, regulators, marketing authorisation holders/applicants and healthcare stakeholders broadly, and their implementation would greatly facilitate the use of these valuable data sources in regulatory decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.