Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302872›Full record

ReviewCurrent hematologic malignancy reports2019

IMiDs New and Old.

Samuel Yamshon, Jia Ruan

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current hematologic malignancy reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Immunomodulatory Drugs for the Treatment of B Cell Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Protein Ligand Interactions Using Surface Plasmon Resonance.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Regulation of Cullin-RING E3 ligase dynamics by Inositol hexakisphosphate.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samuel YamshonDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 1305 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
Jia RuanDivision of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine and New York Presbyterian Hospital, 1305 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10021, USA. jruan@med.cornell.edu.
Cornell University · USNew York Hospital Queens · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewIMiDs are a class of biologic agents with immunomodulatory, anti-angiogenic, and direct anti-cancer activities. This review summarizes current data on clinical development and application of IMiDs in non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) subtypes, focusing primarily on lenalidomide, with additional discussion on managing common side effects. RECENT

findingsImproved upon the prototype thalidomide, the second-generation compound lenalidomide has enhanced immunological and anti-cancer properties with fewer side effects, while next-generation small molecule cereblon/E3 ubiquitin ligase modulator CC-122 is in early clinical studies. Lenalidomide is FDA-approved for treatment of relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma as a single agent, as well as in combination with rituximab for R/R follicular lymphoma and marginal zone lymphoma. In addition, numerous clinical trials of lenalidomide, as single agent, in combination with anti-CD20 antibodies, or in combination with chemoimmunotherapy regimens, have shown promise in aggressive and indolent NHL in both the upfront and relapsed/refractory setting. As clinical trials with lenalidomide continue to find success in both indolent and aggressive lymphomas, IMiDs are poised to be important building blocks for combinatorial strategies with antibodies, chemotherapy, novel target agents, and emerging immunotherapy involving immune checkpoint inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy. Delineation of treatment-specific and disease-specific biomarkers is an important research objective to gain insight into potential mechanisms of action, and to guide future clinical development.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersDisease SusceptibilityDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHematologic NeoplasmsHumansImmunologic FactorsRecurrenceThalidomideAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkersImmunologic FactorsThalidomideAvadomideImmunomodulationLenalidomideLymphomaThalidomide

Identifiers

PMID31302872
OpenAlexW2960147818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.