Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302812›Full record

ReviewJournal of muscle research and cell motility2019

After the revolution: how is Cryo-EM contributing to muscle research?

Marston Bradshaw, Danielle M Paul

Open access · hybridAbstract readHistorical ArticleReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Ab initio reconstruction from one-dimensional crystal diffraction data.Acta crystallographica. Section A, Foundations and advances · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marston BradshawDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK.
Danielle M PaulDepartment of Physiology & Pharmacology, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TD, UK. Danielle.paul@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7327-0023
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Academy of Medical Sciences SBF003\1142Alan Turing Institute PROOF_projectBritish Heart Foundation FS/14/18/3071British Heart Foundation FS/14/18/30711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The technique of electron microscopy (EM) has been fundamental to muscle research since the days of Huxley and Hanson. Direct observation of how proteins in the sarcomere are arranged and visualising the changes that occur upon activation have greatly increased our understanding of function. In the 1980s specimen preparation techniques for biological EM moved away from traditional fixing and staining. The technique known as cryo-electron microscopy (Cryo-EM) was developed, which involves rapidly freezing proteins in liquid ethane which maintains them in a near native state. Within the last 5 years there has been a step change in the achievable resolution using Cryo-EM. This 'resolution revolution' can be attributed to advances in detector technology, microscope automation and maximum likelihood image processing. In this article we look at how Cryo-EM has contributed to the field of muscle research in this post revolution era, focussing on recently published high resolution structures of sarcomeric proteins.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiomedical ResearchCryoelectron MicroscopyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyHumansSarcomeres3D reconstructionActinCryo-EMMyosinThin filament

Identifiers

PMID31302812
PMCPMC6726666
OpenAlexW2957960072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.