Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302755›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2019

Effects of surgery on survival of elderly patients with stage I small-cell lung cancer: analysis of the SEER database.

Yan Li, Song Hu, Jun Xie, Xian Zhang, Yun Zong, Bin Xu, Chong Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The current role of surgery and SBRT in early stage of small cell lung cancer.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou, 213003, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0103-6382
Song HuDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Jun XieDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Xian ZhangDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Yun ZongDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Bin XuLaboratory of Cancer Research, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou, 213003, China.
Chong LiDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 185 Juqian Road, Changzhou, 213003, China. zeyou06@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9215-6779

Funding

International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of the Changzhou Science and Technology Bureau CZ20140016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSurgery improves survival of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients in early stage. However, the role of surgery in the elderly stage I SCLC patients is not well established. We designed this retrospective study to explore the efficacy of surgery on survival of this subset population. PATIENTS AND

methodsElderly patients aged ≥ 75 years with stage I SCLC diagnosed histologically from 1998 to 2013 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Included patients were divided into surgery group (received surgery, accompanied by chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or both or neither), non-surgical group (only received radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or combination), and untreated group. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (LCSS) were compared among the three groups by the Kaplan-Meier analysis. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify factors associated with survival.

resultsA total of 983 patients were included. Among all of the patients, 24.0% patients received surgery, 46.6% patients received non-surgical treatment, and 29.4% patients received no treatment. The 5-year OS rates of surgery, non-surgical and untreated groups were 31%, 12% and 6%, respectively (P < 0.0001). In multivariable analysis, surgery was an important factor that improved OS when compared with non-surgical treatment (HR 0.554; 95% CI 0.458-0.670 [P < 0.0001]). In subgroup analysis, surgery remained an independent factor for OS among patients aged 75-79 years (HR 0.506; 95% CI 0.391-0.655 [P < 0.0001]) and 80-84 years (HR 0.544; 95% CI 0.388-0.763 [P < 0.0001]), while did not reach statistical significance when compared to non-surgical treatment for patients age ≥ 85 years (HR 0.914; 95% CI 0.507-1.650; [P = 0.766]).

conclusionSurgical resection significantly improved OS in stage I SCLC patients aged 75-84 years in our study, but further exploration in larger prospective clinical trials is needed.

Indexed as

PneumonectomyAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleNeoplasm StagingRetrospective StudiesSEER ProgramSmall Cell Lung CarcinomaSurvival RateElderlySEERSmall-cell lung cancerSurgery

Identifiers

PMID31302755
PMCPMC11810287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.