Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302747›Full record

SynthesisJournal of neurology2019

Deep brain stimulation for Meige syndrome: a meta-analysis with individual patient data.

Xin Wang, Zhibin Zhang, Zhiqi Mao, Xinguang Yu

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Deep brain stimulation for Meige syndrome.Surgical neurology international · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Volume of tissue activated within subthalamic nucleus and clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation in Meige syndrome.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Arching deep brain stimulation in dystonia types.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Review
  20. Tardive Blepharospasm May Respond to Bilateral Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation.Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements (New York, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xin WangSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Naikai District, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Zhibin ZhangSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Naikai District, Tianjin, 300071, China.
Zhiqi MaoDepartment of Neurosurgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese, PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100853, China.
Xinguang YuSchool of Medicine, Nankai University, 94 Weijin Road, Naikai District, Tianjin, 300071, China. xinguang_yu301@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-6529
Nankai University · CNChinese PLA General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDeep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective intervention for Meige syndrome, a type of dystonia characterized by blepharospasm, facial, and oromandibular dystonia. This individual patient-level data meta-analysis was to identify the potential outcome predictors, compare the stimulation targets and summarize the efficacy of DBS for Meige syndrome.

methodsThree electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science and Embase) were searched with no publication data restriction to identify studies regarding DBS for Meige syndrome. The primary outcome was the improvement in BFMDRS-M score. Pearson's correlation coefficients and a stepwise multivariate regression analysis were used to identify the potential prognostic factors.

resultsTwenty-three studies (115 patients, 94 with pallidal stimulation and 21 with subthalamic stimulation) were eligible. Patients showed significant improvement in Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement (BFMDRS-M) (21.5 ± 11.0 vs 8.6 ± 6.9, P < 0.001) and disability (BFMDRS-D) (6.4 ± 5.1 vs 2.9 ± 2.4, P < 0.001) scores at the last follow-up visit (31.9 ± 30.7 months), compared with scores at baseline. Preoperative BFMDRS-M and BFMDRS-D scores were positively correlated with the relative changes in BFMDRS-M score at the last follow-up visit. On the stepwise multivariate regression, only the preoperative BFMDRS remained significant in the best predictive model.

conclusionsBased on the existing evidence, pallidal/subthalamic stimulation is an effective therapy for even the refractory Meige syndrome. Higher preoperative scores probably indicate larger improvement. Stimulation targets or other clinical factors do not constitute the outcome predictive factors.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationHumansMeige SyndromeDeep brain stimulationGlobus pallidus internusIndividual patient dataMeige syndromeMeta-analysisPredictive factorsSubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID31302747
OpenAlexW2960212770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.