ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2019
Dependency Between Protein-Protein Interactions and Protein Variability and Evolutionary Rates in Vertebrates: Observed Relationships and Stochastic Modeling.
Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multiple molecular and cellular properties jointly affect protein and site-specific evolutionary rates.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Bayesian network models identify cooperative GPCR:G protein interactions that contribute to G protein coupling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2024Article
- Understanding the evolution of immune genes in jawed vertebrates.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Review
- Comparative Serum Proteome Analysis Indicates a Negative Correlation between a Higher Immune Level and Feed Efficiency in Pigs.Veterinary sciences · 2023Article
- 2019 Zuckerkandl Prize.Journal of molecular evolution · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent developments in sequencing and growth of bioinformatics resources provide us with vast depositories of protein network and single nucleotide polymorphism data. It allows us to re-examine, on a larger and more comprehensive scale, the relationship between protein-protein interactions and protein variability and evolutionary rates. This relationship has remained far from unambiguously resolved for quite a long time, reflecting shifting analysis approaches in the literature, and growing data availability. In this study, we utilized several public genomic databases to investigate this relationship in human, mouse, pig, chicken, and zebrafish. We observed strong non-linear relationship patterns (tending towards convex decreasing function shapes) between protein variability and the density of corresponding protein-protein interactions across all five species. To investigate further, we carried out stochastic simulations, modeling the interplay between protein connectivity and variability. Our results indicate that a simple negative linear correlation model, often suggested (or tacitly assumed) in the literature, as either a null or an alternative hypothesis, is not a good fit with the observed data. After considering different (but still relatively simple, and not overfitting) simulation models, we found that a convex decreasing protein variability-connectivity function (specifically, exponential decay) led to a much better fit with the real data. We conclude that simple correlation models might be inadequate for describing protein variability-connectivity interplay in vertebrates; they often tend towards false negatives (showing no more than marginal linear or rank correlation where there are in fact strong non-random patterns).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.