ArticlePsychopharmacology2019
Ethanol-induced changes in synaptic amino acid neurotransmitter levels in the nucleus accumbens of differentially sensitized mice.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleEthanol-induced behavioural sensitization (EBS) does not occur uniformly in mice exposed to the sensitization paradigm. This suggests innate differential responses to ethanol (EtOH) in the reward circuitry of individual animals.
objectivesTo better characterize the adaptive differences between low-sensitized (LS) and high-sensitized (HS) mice, we examined excitatory amino acid (EAA) and inhibitory amino acid (IAA) neurotransmitter levels in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) during EBS expression.
methodsMale DBA/2J mice received five ethanol (EtOH) (2.2 g/kg) or saline injections, and locomotor activity (LMA) was assessed during EBS induction. EtOH mice were classified as LS or HS on the basis of final LMA scores. Following an EtOH challenge (1.8 g/kg) 2 weeks later, LMA was re-evaluated and in vivo microdialysis samples were collected from the NAc.
resultsMost differences in amino acid levels were observed within the first 20 min after EtOH challenge. LS mice exhibited similar glutamate levels compared with acutely treated (previously EtOH naïve) mice, and generally increased levels of the IAAs GABA, glycine, and taurine. By contrast, HS mice exhibited increased glutamate and attenuated levels of GABA, glycine, and taurine.
conclusionThese data suggest that the profile of amino acid neurotransmitters in the NAc of LS and HS mice significantly differs. Elucidating these adaptive differences contributes to our understanding of factors that confer susceptibility/resilience to alcohol use disorder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.