Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302712›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2020

Validation of simple measures of aortic distensibility based on standard 4-chamber cine CMR: a new approach for clinical studies.

Lukas Stoiber, Niky Ghorbani, Marcus Kelm, Titus Kuehne, Nina Rank, Tomas Lapinskas, Christian Stehning, Burkert Pieske, Volkmar Falk, Rolf Gebker and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development of a novel CT-derived measure of cardiovascular health: the CT aortic stiffness index (CTASI).Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lukas StoiberDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany. stoiber@dhzb.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2368-0999
Niky GhorbaniDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Marcus KelmDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Titus KuehneDepartment of Congenital Heart Disease/Pediatric Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Nina RankDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Tomas LapinskasDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Christian StehningPhilips Health Care, Hamburg, Germany.
Burkert PieskeDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Volkmar FalkDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Rolf GebkerDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian KelleDepartment of Internal Medicine/Cardiology, German Heart Center Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité · DELithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTPhilips (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAortic distensibility (AD) represents a well-established parameter of aortic stiffness. It remains unclear, however, whether AD can be obtained with high reproducibility in standard 4-chamber cine CMR images of the descending aorta. This study investigated the intra- and inter-observer agreement of AD based on different angles of the aorta and provided a sample size calculation of AD for future trials.

methodsThirty-one patients underwent CMR. Angulation of the descending aorta was performed to obtain strictly transversal and orthogonal cross-sectional aortic areas. AD was obtained both area and diameter based.

resultsFor area-based values, inter-observer agreement was highest for 4-chamber AD (ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.93-99), followed by orthogonal AD (ICC 0.96; 95% CI 0.91-98) and transversal AD (ICC 0.93; 95% CI 0.80-97). For diameter-based values, agreement was also highest for 4-chamber AD (ICC 0.97; 95% CI 0.94-99), followed by orthogonal AD (ICC 0.96; 95% CI 0.92-98) and transversal AD (ICC 0.91; 95% CI 0.77-96). Bland-Altman plots confirmed a small variation among observers. Sample size calculation showed a sample size of 12 patients to detect a change in 4-chamber AD of 1 × 10

conclusionAD measurements are highly reproducible and allow an accurate and rapid assessment of arterial compliance from standard 4-chamber cine CMR.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging, CineVascular StiffnessAortaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesAortic distensibilityCardiac magnetic resonance imagingCine MRIComplianceReproducibility

Identifiers

PMID31302712
PMCPMC7098938
OpenAlexW2960549473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.