Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302601›Full record

Trial reportBMJ quality & safety2020

Effect of hands-on interprofessional simulation training for local emergencies in Scotland: the THISTLE stepped-wedge design randomised controlled trial.

Erik Lenguerrand, Cathy Winter, Dimitrios Siassakos, Graeme MacLennan, Karen Innes, Pauline Lynch, Alan Cameron, Joanna Crofts, Alison McDonald, Kirsty McCormack and 4 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ quality & safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Erik LenguerrandTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK erik.lenguerrand@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-0371-731X
Cathy WinterDepartment of Women's Health and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK.
Dimitrios SiassakosInstitute for Women's Health, UCL, London, United Kingdom.
Graeme MacLennanCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Karen InnesCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Pauline LynchMaternity Unit, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, NHS Tayside, Dundee, UK.
Alan CameronIan Donald Fetal Medicine Centre, Queen Elizabeth University Hospital, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde, Glasgow, UK.
Joanna CroftsDepartment of Women's Health and Children's Health, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Westbury on Trym, UK.
Alison McDonaldCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Kirsty McCormackCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Mark ForrestCentre for Healthcare Randomised Trials, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
John NorrieEdinburgh Clinical Trials Unit, Centre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Siladitya BhattacharyaInstitute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Tim DraycottTranslational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/893Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess whether the implementation of an intrapartum training package (PROMPT (PRactical Obstetric Multi-Professional Training)) across a health service reduced the proportion of term babies born with Apgar score <7 at 5 min (<7

designStepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trial.

settingTwelve randomised maternity units with ≥900 births/year in Scotland. Three additional units were included in a supplementary analysis to assess the effect across Scotland. The intervention commenced in March 2014 with follow-up until September 2016.

interventionThe PROMPT training package (Second edition), with subsequent unit-level implementation of PROMPT courses for all maternity staff.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of term babies with Apgar<7

results87 204 eligible births (99.2% with an Apgar score), of which 1291 infants had an Apgar<7

conclusionsPROMPT training, as implemented, had no effect on the rate of Apgar <7 TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN11640515.

Indexed as

Apgar ScoreClinical CompetenceQuality ImprovementEmergenciesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornInterprofessional RelationsMaleMaternal-Child NursingPregnancyReference ValuesRisk AssessmentScotlandSimulation TrainingTerm Birthapgar scoreintrapartum emergenciesobstetricsstepped-wedge trialtraining course

Identifiers

PMID31302601
PMCPMC7045781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.