Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302478›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in psychology2019

The tempos of performance.

Nir Shalev, Anna-Katharina R Bauer, Anna C Nobre

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The enigma of infra-slow fluctuations in the human EEG.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nir ShalevDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, and Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: nir.shalev@psy.ox.ac.uk.
Anna-Katharina R BauerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, and Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anna C NobreDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Department of Psychiatry, and Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104571/Z/14/ZWellcome Trust 203139/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human performance fluctuates over time. Rather than random, the complex time course of variation reflects, among other factors, influences from regular periodic processes operating at multiple time scales. In this review, we consider evidence for how our performance ebbs and flows over fractions of seconds as we engage with sensory objects, over minutes as we perform tasks, and over hours according to homeostatic factors. We propose that rhythms of performance at these multiple tempos arise from the interplay among three sources of influence: intrinsic fluctuations in brain activity, periodicity of external stimulation, and the anticipation of the temporal structure of external stimulation by the brain.

Indexed as

Task Performance and AnalysisBrainCircadian RhythmElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsHumansPeriodicity

Identifiers

PMID31302478
PMCPMC6996131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.