ArticleJournal of communication disorders
Speech-language development as proceduralization and skill learning: Implications for assessment and intervention.
Article in Journal of communication disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- What has been researched about implicit memory in speech-language-hearing pathology? A scoping review.CoDAS · 2026Article
- Enhancing Syntactic Knowledge in School-Age Children With Developmental Language Disorder: The Promise of Syntactic Priming.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Review
- Data-Informed Guideposts for Decision Making in Enhanced Conversational Recast Treatment.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- An alternative to the procedural∼declarative memory account of developmental language disorder.Journal of communication disordersArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThis article considers how speech-language development can be viewed as proceduralization and skill learning. Viewing speech-language development in this way has important implications for the assessment and treatment of individuals with speech-language disorders.
methodTopics discussed are Ullman's (2016) distinction between the procedural and declarative memory systems, speech-language development as proceduralization and skill learning, and implications for assessment and intervention.
conclusionNorm-referenced measures provide a good measure of deliberative speech-language processes whereas social conversations and discourses about familiar topics with familiar listeners provide the best indication of proceduralized speech-language processes. Intervention goals and planning need to consider which speech-language operations should be proceduralized and which ones will primarily require deliberative processing. Additional research and clinical application of these ideas are clearly needed to develop more precise criteria to define the line of demarcation between deliberative and proceduralized speech-language processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.