Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31302301›Full record

ReviewPractical radiation oncology2019

Literature Review of Vaginal Stenosis and Dilator Use in Radiation Oncology.

Shari Damast, Diana D Jeffery, Christina H Son, Yasmin Hasan, Jeanne Carter, Stacy Tessler Lindau, Anuja Jhingran

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Practical radiation oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05648253 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study to Assess the Feasibility of Use of a Novel Vaginal Dilator Device Post-radiation for Patients With Pelvic Malignancies

TypeinterventionalSponsorHyivy Health IncRan2025 to 2026Enrolled12ConditionsVaginal Stenosis, Radiation Therapy, Cancer, Pelvic PainArmsHyivy Intravaginal Device
NCT07698795 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Vaginal Dilator Use on Vaginal Morbidity and Quality of Life Following Definitive Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer.

TypeobservationalSponsorChulabhorn Cancer CenterRan2020 to 2022Enrolled67ConditionsCervical Cancer Radiation Complications, QoL
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Research progress in female pelvic floor rehabilitation aids.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Clinical Practice Strategies to Address Sexual Health in Female Cancer Survivors.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2023
    Review
  19. Exploring Brachytherapy Discharge Educational Needs of Gynecological Cancer Patients.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Shari DamastDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut. Electronic address: shari.damast@yale.edu.
Diana D JefferyDepartment of Defense, Defense Health Agency, Falls Church, Virginia.
Christina H SonDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Yasmin HasanDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Jeanne CarterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stacy Tessler LindauDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Department of Medicine-Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Anuja JhingranDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
University of Chicago · USDefense Health Agency · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USYale University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeGuidelines for the care of women undergoing pelvic radiation therapy (RT) recommend vaginal dilator therapy (VDT) to prevent radiation-induced vaginal stenosis (VS); however, no standard protocol exists. This review seeks to update our current state of knowledge concerning VS and VDT in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A comprehensive literature review (1972-2017) was conducted using search terms "vaginal stenosis," "radiation," and "vaginal dilator." Information was organized by key concepts including VS definition, time course, pathophysiology, risk factors, and interventions.

resultsVS is a well-described consequence of pelvic RT, with early manifestations and late changes evolving over several years. Strong risk factors for VS include RT dose and volume of vagina irradiated. Resultant vaginal changes can interfere with sexual function and correlational studies support the use of preventive VDT. The complexity of factors that drive noncompliance with VDT is well recognized. There are no prospective data to guide optimal duration of VDT, and the consistency with which radiation oncologists monitor VS and manage its consequences is unknown.

conclusionsThis review provides information concerning VS definition, pathophysiology, and risk factors and identifies domains of VDT practice that are understudied. Prospective efforts to monitor and measure outcomes of patients who are prescribed VDT are needed to guide practice.

Indexed as

Constriction, PathologicDilatationFemaleHumansRadiation OncologyVagina

Identifiers

PMID31302301
PMCPMC7944435
OpenAlexW2956235661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.