ArticleGastroenterology2020
Long-term Risk of Colorectal Cancer After Removal of Conventional Adenomas and Serrated Polyps.
Article in Gastroenterology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07523035 (An Ambidirectional Cohort Study on Colorectal Adenoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 119 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
An Ambidirectional Cohort Study on Colorectal Adenoma
Who cites it
119 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 280 citations in OpenAlex.
- Linked color imaging versus conventional white-light colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of salvage endoscopy in the treatment of residual or recurrent colorectal neoplasia after endoscopic resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Pooled it
- NCCN Guidelines Insights: Colorectal Cancer Screening, Version 2.2020.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2020Guideline
- Guideline
- Use of an AI Image Recognition-Based Smartphone App in Personalized Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Long-Term Colorectal Cancer Incidence After Adenoma and Serrated Polyp Removal: Results From the Colonprev Trial.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Trial
- Low-residue diet with oral nutritional supplements prior to colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation: an endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Trial
- Polyp size measurement during colonoscopy using a virtual scale: variability and systematic differences.Endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Pre-administration of super-low volume polyethylene glycol is as effective as senna laxative as bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized controlled phase 2 trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- Bridging the Precancerous Gap in Colorectal Cancer Through AI-Enhanced Liquid Biopsy, Endoscopy, and Digital Pathology.Cancers · 2026Review
- Real-Time AI-Assisted Detection of Colonic Lesions Using the iIDEAS Intelligent-C Module: A Prospective Single-Center Validation Study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Article
- Burden profiles and mortality-attributable risk factors for gastrointestinal cancers: A comprehensive analysis, 1990-2021.Journal of advanced research · 2026Article
- Management of Colorectal Sessile Serrated Lesions in Elderly Patients.Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · 2026Review
- Article
- Risk of advanced adenoma detection in colorectal cancer screening programmes according to personal characteristics and screening history.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Endoscopic characterization and development of a prediction model for colorectal adenomatous polyps.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2026Article
- Noninvasive diagnosis of colorectal adenoma: The emerging potential of blood-based biomarkers.World journal of gastroenterology · 2026Review
- Sessile Serrated Lesion Detection Rate and Colorectal Cancer Risk and Mortality.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Demographic and Clinicopathologic Factors Associated With Colorectal Adenoma Recurrence.JAMA network open · 2026Observational
- Colorectal Cancer Screening at 40: Real Benefit or Justifiable Cost?GE Portuguese journal of gastroenterology · 2026Article
59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND &
aimsEndoscopic screening reduces incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer (CRC) because precursor lesions, such as conventional adenomas or serrated polyps, are removed. Individuals with polypectomies are advised to undergo colonoscopy surveillance to prevent CRC. However, guidelines for surveillance intervals after diagnosis of a precursor lesion, particularly for individuals with serrated polyps, vary widely, and lack sufficient supporting evidence. Consequently, some high-risk patients do not receive enough surveillance and lower-risk subjects receive excessive surveillance.
methodsWe examined the association between findings from first endoscopy and CRC risk among 122,899 participants who underwent flexible sigmoidoscopy or colonoscopy in the Nurses' Health Study 1 (1990-2012), Nurses' Health Study 2 (1989-2013), or the Health Professionals Follow-up Study (1990-2012). Endoscopic findings were categorized as no polyp, conventional adenoma, or serrated polyp (hyperplastic polyp, traditional serrated adenoma, or sessile serrated adenoma, with or without cytological dysplasia). Conventional adenomas were classified as advanced (≥10 mm, high-grade dysplasia, or tubulovillous or villous histology) or nonadvanced, and serrated polyps were assigned to categories of large (≥10 mm) or small (<10 mm). We used a Cox proportional hazards regression model to calculate the hazard ratios (HRs) of CRC incidence, after adjusting for various potential risk factors.
resultsAfter a median follow-up period of 10 years, we documented 491 incident cases of CRC: 51 occurred in 6161 participants with conventional adenomas, 24 in 5918 participants with serrated polyps, and 427 in 112,107 participants with no polyp. Compared with participants with no polyp detected during initial endoscopy, the multivariable HR for incident CRC in individuals with an advanced adenoma was 4.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.89-5.72) and the HR for CRC in individuals with a large serrated polyp was 3.35 (95% CI 1.37-8.15). In contrast, there was no significant increase in risk of CRC in patients with nonadvanced adenomas (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.68-2.16, P = .52) or small serrated polyps (HR 1.25; 95% CI 0.76-2.08; P = .38).
conclusionsThese findings provide support for guidelines that recommend repeat lower endoscopy within 3 years of a diagnosis of advanced adenoma and large serrated polyps. In contrast, patients with nonadvanced adenoma or small serrated polyps may not require more intensive surveillance than patients without polyps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.