ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2019
Nonequilibrium atomistic molecular dynamics simulation of tubular nanomotor propelled by bubble propulsion.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Stable Cavitation Interferes with AβJournal of chemical information and modeling · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We develop a molecular nanoscaled model for tubular motors propelled by bubble propulsion. The motor is modeled by a carbon nanotube, and the bubble is represented by a particle interacting with water by a time-dependent potential. Effects of liquid viscosity, fuel concentration, geometry, and size of the tube on the performance of the motor are effectively encoded into two parameters: time scales of the bubble expansion and bubble formation. Our results are qualitatively consistent with experimental data of much larger motors. Simulations suggest that (i) the displacement of the tube is optimized if two time scales are as short as possible, (ii) the compromise between the performance and fuel consumption is achieved if the bubble formation time is shorter than the velocity correlation time of the tube, (iii) the motor efficiency is higher with slow expansion, short formation of the bubble than fast growth but long formation time, and (iv) the tube is propelled by strong forces on the order of mN, reaching high speeds up to ∼60 m/s. Our simulation may be useful for refining and encouraging future experimental work on nanomotors having the size of a few nanometers. The tiny size and high speed motors could have great potential applications in real life.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.