Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31301340›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2019

Tumor-specific delivery of gemcitabine with activatable liposomes.

Samantha T Tucci, Azadeh Kheirolomoom, Elizabeth S Ingham, Lisa M Mahakian, Sarah M Tam, Josquin Foiret, Neil E Hubbard, Alexander D Borowsky, Mo Baikoghli, R Holland Cheng and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Samantha T TucciUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Azadeh KheirolomoomUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Stanford University, Department of Radiology, 3165 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Elizabeth S InghamUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Lisa M MahakianUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Sarah M TamUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Josquin FoiretStanford University, Department of Radiology, 3165 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
Neil E HubbardUniversity of California, Davis, Center for Comparative Medicine, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Alexander D BorowskyUniversity of California, Davis, Center for Comparative Medicine, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Mo BaikoghliUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
R Holland ChengUniversity of California, Davis, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Katherine W FerraraStanford University, Department of Radiology, 3165 Porter Drive, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA. Electronic address: kwferrar@stanford.edu.
University of California, Davis · USStanford University · US

Funding

Specific and high-resolution ultrasound cancer imagingR01CA112356 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W, FOIRET, JOSQUIN · 2005 to 2022
$6.1M
Ultrasound imaging and enhanced therapeutic responseR01CA134659 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W · 2009 to 2017
$4.4M
Large aperture and wideband modular ultrasound arrays for the diagnosis of liver cancerR01CA211602 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W, TRAHEY, GREGG E. · 2017 to 2021
$3.3M
Image-guided ultrasound therapy and drug delivery in pancreatic cancerR01CA210553 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W · 2016 to 2020
$3.2M
Optimized ultrasound-enhanced immunotherapyR01CA199658 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W · 2015 to 2019
$2.5M
Predoctoral Training in Pharmacological SciencesT32GM099608 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI HELL, JOHANNES W · 2012 to 2021
$2.2M
Engineering Approaches to Molecular Imaging TrainingT32EB003827 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA DAVIS · PI FERRARA, KATHERINE W · 2004 to 2013
$1.6M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA112356NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134659NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199658NCI NIH HHS R01 CA210553NCI NIH HHS R01 CA211602NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB003827NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM099608
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gemcitabine delivery to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is limited by poor pharmacokinetics, dense fibrosis and hypo-vascularization. Activatable liposomes, with drug release resulting from local heating, enhance serum stability and circulation, and the released drug retains the ability to diffuse within the tumor. A limitation of liposomal gemcitabine has been the low loading efficiency. To address this limitation, we used the superior solubilizing potential of copper (II) gluconate to form a complex with gemcitabine at copper:gemcitabine (1:4). Thermosensitive liposomes composed of DPPC:DSPC:DSPE-PEG2k (80:15:5, mole%) then reached 12 wt% loading, 4-fold greater than previously reported values. Cryo transmission electron microscopy confirmed the presence of a liquid crystalline gemcitabine‑copper mixture. The optimized gemcitabine liposomes released 60% and 80% of the gemcitabine within 1 and 5 min, respectively, at 42 °C. Liposomal encapsulation resulted in a circulation half-life of ~2 h in vivo (compared to reported circulation of 16 min for free gemcitabine in mice), and free drug was not detected within the plasma. The resulting gemcitabine liposomes were efficacious against both murine breast cancer and pancreatic cancer in vitro. Three repeated treatments of activatable gemcitabine liposomes plus ultrasound hyperthermia regressed or eliminated tumors in the neu deletion model of murine breast cancer with limited toxicity, enhancing survival when compared to treatment with gemcitabine alone. With 5% of the free gemcitabine dose (5 rather than 100 mg/kg), tumor growth was suppressed to the same degree as gemcitabine. Additionally, in a more aggressive tumor model of murine pancreatic cancer, liposomal gemcitabine combined with local hyperthermia induced cell death and regions of apoptosis and necrosis.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorDelayed-Action PreparationsDeoxycytidineDrug Delivery SystemsDrug LiberationFemaleGemcitabineHumansHyperthermia, InducedLiposomesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPancreatic NeoplasmsAntimetabolites, AntineoplasticDelayed-Action PreparationsDeoxycytidineGemcitabineLiposomesBreast cancerGemcitabinePancreatic ductal adenocarcinomaTemperature-sensitive liposomeUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID31301340
PMCPMC6815719
OpenAlexW2956354059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.