ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2019
Tumor-specific delivery of gemcitabine with activatable liposomes.
Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- CD276-directed supramolecular nanoplatform with pH-triggered gemcitabine release for potent tumor stromal and vascular suppression.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2025Article
- Encapsulation of doxorubicin in magnesium acetate liposomes as a pH-sensitive drug carrier for tumor therapy.iScience · 2025Article
- Preclinical advance in nanoliposome-mediated photothermal therapy in liver cancer.Lipids in health and disease · 2025Review
- Functionalized Nanomaterials In Pancreatic Cancer Theranostics And Molecular Imaging.ChemistryOpen · 2025Review
- Thermosensitive Liposomes for Gemcitabine Delivery to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Cancers · 2024Article
- Potent cancer therapy by liposome microstructure tailoring with active-to-passive targeting and shell-to-core thermosensitive features.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Liposomal Nano-Based Drug Delivery Systems for Breast Cancer Therapy: Recent Advances and Progresses.Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistry · 2024Review
- Biomaterial-Based CRISPR/Cas9 Delivery Systems for Tumor Treatment.Biomaterials research · 2024Article
- Innovative Experimental Ultrasound and US-Related Techniques Using the Murine Model in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Article
- In Vitro Measurement and Mathematical Modeling of Thermally-Induced Injury in Pancreatic Cancer Cells.Cancers · 2023Article
- Review
- Anticancer Drugs: Recent Strategies to Improve Stability Profile, Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Properties.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Amphiphilic Dendritic Nanomicelle-Mediated Delivery of Gemcitabine for Enhancing the Specificity and Effectiveness.International journal of nanomedicine · 2022Article
- Emerging pro-drug and nano-drug strategies for gemcitabine-based cancer therapy.Asian journal of pharmaceutical sciences · 2022Review
- Gemcitabine Direct Electrochemical Detection from Pharmaceutical Formulations Using a Boron-Doped Diamond Electrode.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Liposomal Gemcitabine, FF-10832, Improves Plasma Stability, Tumor Targeting, and Antitumor Efficacy of Gemcitabine in Pancreatic Cancer Xenograft Models.Pharmaceutical research · 2021Article
- Heat-activated nanomedicine formulation improves the anticancer potential of the HSP90 inhibitor luminespib in vitro.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Recent Advances in Lipid-Based Nanosystems for Gemcitabine and Gemcitabine-Combination Therapy.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Gemcitabine delivery to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is limited by poor pharmacokinetics, dense fibrosis and hypo-vascularization. Activatable liposomes, with drug release resulting from local heating, enhance serum stability and circulation, and the released drug retains the ability to diffuse within the tumor. A limitation of liposomal gemcitabine has been the low loading efficiency. To address this limitation, we used the superior solubilizing potential of copper (II) gluconate to form a complex with gemcitabine at copper:gemcitabine (1:4). Thermosensitive liposomes composed of DPPC:DSPC:DSPE-PEG2k (80:15:5, mole%) then reached 12 wt% loading, 4-fold greater than previously reported values. Cryo transmission electron microscopy confirmed the presence of a liquid crystalline gemcitabine‑copper mixture. The optimized gemcitabine liposomes released 60% and 80% of the gemcitabine within 1 and 5 min, respectively, at 42 °C. Liposomal encapsulation resulted in a circulation half-life of ~2 h in vivo (compared to reported circulation of 16 min for free gemcitabine in mice), and free drug was not detected within the plasma. The resulting gemcitabine liposomes were efficacious against both murine breast cancer and pancreatic cancer in vitro. Three repeated treatments of activatable gemcitabine liposomes plus ultrasound hyperthermia regressed or eliminated tumors in the neu deletion model of murine breast cancer with limited toxicity, enhancing survival when compared to treatment with gemcitabine alone. With 5% of the free gemcitabine dose (5 rather than 100 mg/kg), tumor growth was suppressed to the same degree as gemcitabine. Additionally, in a more aggressive tumor model of murine pancreatic cancer, liposomal gemcitabine combined with local hyperthermia induced cell death and regions of apoptosis and necrosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.