ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020
Automated deep learning method for whole-breast segmentation in diffusion-weighted breast MRI.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025Review
- Automated deep learning method for whole-breast segmentation in contrast-free quantitative MRI.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Breast Reconstruction Using Laparoscopically Harvested Pedicled Omental Flap: Imaging Findings and a Case of Recurrence Among Eight Patients.Current medical imaging · 2025Article
- Performance of an AI-powered visualization software platform for precision surgery in breast cancer patients.NPJ breast cancer · 2024Article
- Article
- Improvement of semantic segmentation through transfer learning of multi-class regions with convolutional neural networks on supine and prone breast MRI images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Automatic deep learning method for detection and classification of breast lesions in dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2023Article
- Automated methods for sella turcica segmentation on cephalometric radiographic data using deep learning (CNN) techniques.Oral radiology · 2023Article
- The road to breast cancer screening with diffusion MRI.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Review
- Automated segmentation of articular disc of the temporomandibular joint on magnetic resonance images using deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Artificial intelligence in breast cancer imaging: risk stratification, lesion detection and classification, treatment planning and prognosis-a narrative review.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2022Review
- A U-Net Approach to Apical Lesion Segmentation on Panoramic Radiographs.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Deep learning in breast imaging.BJR open · 2022Review
- Accurate segmentation of neonatal brain MRI with deep learning.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2022Article
- Review
- Deep Learning Technology in Pathological Image Analysis of Breast Tissue.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- A Pipeline for Predicting the Treatment Response of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Single MRI Modality: Combining Deep Segmentation Network and Radiomics Analysis Based on "Suspicious Region".Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Whole Volume Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Histogram as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker to Differentiate Breast Lesions: Correlation with the Ki-67 Proliferation Index.BioMed research international · 2021Article
- Multiparametric deep learning tissue signatures for a radiological biomarker of breast cancer: Preliminary results.Medical physics · 2020Article
- Current Status and Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Breast Imaging.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MRI plays an increasingly important role in diagnostic applications and developing imaging biomarkers. Automated whole-breast segmentation is an important yet challenging step for quantitative breast imaging analysis. While methods have been developed on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, automatic whole-breast segmentation in breast DWI MRI is still underdeveloped. PURPOSE: To develop a deep/transfer learning-based segmentation approach for DWI MRI scans and conduct an extensive study assessment on four imaging datasets from both internal and external sources. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: In all, 98 patients (144 MRI scans; 11,035 slices) of four different breast MRI datasets from two different institutions. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: 1.5T scanners with DCE sequence (Dataset 1 and Dataset 2) and DWI sequence. A 3.0T scanner with one external DWI sequence. ASSESSMENT: Deep learning models (UNet and SegNet) and transfer learning were used as segmentation approaches. The main DCE Dataset (4,251 2D slices from 39 patients) was used for pre-training and internal validation, and an unseen DCE Dataset (431 2D slices from 20 patients) was used as an independent test dataset for evaluating the pre-trained DCE models. The main DWI Dataset (6,343 2D slices from 75 MRI scans of 29 patients) was used for transfer learning and internal validation, and an unseen DWI Dataset (10 2D slices from 10 patients) was used for independent evaluation to the fine-tuned models for DWI segmentation. Manual segmentations by three radiologists (>10-year experience) were used to establish the ground truth for assessment. The segmentation performance was measured using the Dice Coefficient (DC) for the agreement between manual expert radiologist's segmentation and algorithm-generated segmentation. STATISTICAL TESTS: The mean value and standard deviation of the DCs were calculated to compare segmentation results from different deep learning models.
resultsFor the segmentation on the DCE MRI, the average DC of the UNet was 0.92 (cross-validation on the main DCE dataset) and 0.87 (external evaluation on the unseen DCE dataset), both higher than the performance of the SegNet. When segmenting the DWI images by the fine-tuned models, the average DC of the UNet was 0.85 (cross-validation on the main DWI dataset) and 0.72 (external evaluation on the unseen DWI dataset), both outperforming the SegNet on the same datasets. DATA
conclusionThe internal and independent tests show that the deep/transfer learning models can achieve promising segmentation effects validated on DWI data from different institutions and scanner types. Our proposed approach may provide an automated toolkit to help computer-aided quantitative analyses of breast DWI images. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:635-643.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.