Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31301201›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2020

Automated deep learning method for whole-breast segmentation in diffusion-weighted breast MRI.

Lei Zhang, Aly A Mohamed, Ruimei Chai, Yuan Guo, Bingjie Zheng, Shandong Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Evolution and Clinical Impact of Deep Learning Technologies in Breast MRI.Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Lei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4424-4942
Aly A MohamedDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ruimei ChaiDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4553-2145
Yuan GuoDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0027-0268
Bingjie ZhengDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Shandong WuDepartments of Radiology, Biomedical Informatics, Bioengineering, Intelligent Systems, and Clinical and Translational Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Quantitative assessment of breast MRIs for breast cancer risk predictionR01CA193603 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, SHANDONG · 2015 to 2018
$1.7M
Deep interpretation of mammographic images in breast cancer screeningR01CA218405 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI WU, SHANDONG · 2018 to 2021
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS #1R01CA193603NCI NIH HHS #1R01CA218405NCI NIH HHS #3R01CA193603-03S1NCI NIH HHS R01 CA193603NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218405Radiological Society of North America #RSCH1530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in MRI plays an increasingly important role in diagnostic applications and developing imaging biomarkers. Automated whole-breast segmentation is an important yet challenging step for quantitative breast imaging analysis. While methods have been developed on dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, automatic whole-breast segmentation in breast DWI MRI is still underdeveloped. PURPOSE: To develop a deep/transfer learning-based segmentation approach for DWI MRI scans and conduct an extensive study assessment on four imaging datasets from both internal and external sources. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective. SUBJECTS: In all, 98 patients (144 MRI scans; 11,035 slices) of four different breast MRI datasets from two different institutions. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCES: 1.5T scanners with DCE sequence (Dataset 1 and Dataset 2) and DWI sequence. A 3.0T scanner with one external DWI sequence. ASSESSMENT: Deep learning models (UNet and SegNet) and transfer learning were used as segmentation approaches. The main DCE Dataset (4,251 2D slices from 39 patients) was used for pre-training and internal validation, and an unseen DCE Dataset (431 2D slices from 20 patients) was used as an independent test dataset for evaluating the pre-trained DCE models. The main DWI Dataset (6,343 2D slices from 75 MRI scans of 29 patients) was used for transfer learning and internal validation, and an unseen DWI Dataset (10 2D slices from 10 patients) was used for independent evaluation to the fine-tuned models for DWI segmentation. Manual segmentations by three radiologists (>10-year experience) were used to establish the ground truth for assessment. The segmentation performance was measured using the Dice Coefficient (DC) for the agreement between manual expert radiologist's segmentation and algorithm-generated segmentation. STATISTICAL TESTS: The mean value and standard deviation of the DCs were calculated to compare segmentation results from different deep learning models.

resultsFor the segmentation on the DCE MRI, the average DC of the UNet was 0.92 (cross-validation on the main DCE dataset) and 0.87 (external evaluation on the unseen DCE dataset), both higher than the performance of the SegNet. When segmenting the DWI images by the fine-tuned models, the average DC of the UNet was 0.85 (cross-validation on the main DWI dataset) and 0.72 (external evaluation on the unseen DWI dataset), both outperforming the SegNet on the same datasets. DATA

conclusionThe internal and independent tests show that the deep/transfer learning models can achieve promising segmentation effects validated on DWI data from different institutions and scanner types. Our proposed approach may provide an automated toolkit to help computer-aided quantitative analyses of breast DWI images. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:635-643.

Indexed as

Deep LearningBreastDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective Studiesbreast MRIbreast segmentationdeep learningdiffusion-weighted imaging

Identifiers

PMID31301201
PMCPMC8581817
OpenAlexW2956190455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.