Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31301058›Full record

ReviewJournal of nephrology2019

Update on ANCA-associated vasculitis: from biomarkers to therapy.

Martina Tedesco, Maurizio Gallieni, Francesca Pellegata, Mario Cozzolino, Federico Alberici

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nephrology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. ANCA-associated vasculitis.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Martina TedescoNephrology Unit and Immunology Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Maurizio GallieniASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco, Milan, Italy.
Francesca PellegataNephrology Unit and Immunology Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Mario CozzolinoNephrology Unit and Immunology Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Federico AlbericiNephrology Unit and Immunology Clinic, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy. federico.alberici@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1686-5709

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) are the prototype of a disease characterised by the presence of a biomarker; ANCA positivity in fact is recorded in 90% of cases of GPA and MPA. The role of ANCA in the management of AAV ranges from diagnostic to prognostic purposes with also therapeutic implications. Changes in clinical practice with the increased use of rituximab have drawn attention to B-cells as a biomarker able to contribute to patient management. Cytokines and other circulating factors, although still at a research stage, may represent future biomarkers of interest or even therapeutic options. From the point of view of renal involvement in AAV, proteinuria and microhematuria are still the biomarkers employed in everyday clinical practice with a proposed role for emerging ones (MCP1, CD163 and CD25). The aim of this review is to discuss the role of well-known biomarkers in everyday clinical management of AAV patients as well as future perspectives for those that are still at a research stage with attention to therapeutic implications.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicAnti-Neutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibody-Associated VasculitisBiomarkersHumansImmunosuppression TherapyPrognosisAntibodies, Antineutrophil CytoplasmicBiomarkersANCAB-cellsBiomarkersRituximabVasculitis

Identifiers

PMID31301058

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.