Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31301007›Full record

ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019

Leveraging network analysis to support experts in their analyses of subjects with MCI and AD.

Paolo Lo Giudice, Nadia Mammone, Francesco Carlo Morabito, Rocco Giuseppe Pizzimenti, Domenico Ursino, Luca Virgili

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Paolo Lo GiudiceDIIES, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Nadia MammoneIRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo, Messina, Italy.
Francesco Carlo MorabitoDICEAM, University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy.
Rocco Giuseppe PizzimentiDeloitte TTL, London, UK.
Domenico UrsinoDII, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy. d.ursino@univpm.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1360-8499
Luca VirgiliDII, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy.

Funding

Dipartimento di Ingegneria dell'Informazione RSABMinistero della Salute GR-2011- 02351397.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a network analysis-based approach to help experts in their analyses of subjects with mild cognitive impairment (hereafter, MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (hereafter, AD) and to investigate the evolution of these subjects over time. The inputs of our approach are the electroencephalograms (hereafter, EEGs) of the patients to analyze, performed at a certain time and, again, 3 months later. Given an EEG of a subject, our approach constructs a network with nodes that represent the electrodes and edges that denote connections between electrodes. Then, it applies several network-based techniques allowing the investigation of subjects with MCI and AD and the analysis of their evolution over time. (i) A connection coefficient, supporting experts to distinguish patients with MCI from patients with AD; (ii) A conversion coefficient, supporting experts to verify if a subject with MCI is converting to AD; (iii) Some network motifs, i.e., network patterns very frequent in one kind of patient and absent, or very rare, in the other. Patients with AD, just by the very nature of their condition, cannot be forced to stay motionless while undergoing examinations for a long time. EEG is a non-invasive examination that can be easily done on them. Since AD and MCI, if prodromal to AD, are associated with a loss of cortical connections, the adoption of network analysis appears suitable to investigate the effects of the progression of the disease on EEG. This paper confirms the suitability of this idea Graphical Abstract Ability of our proposed model to distinguish a control subject from a patient with MCI and a patient with AD. Blue edges represent strong connections among the corresponding brain areas; red edges denote middle connections, whereas green edges indicate weak connections. In the control subject (at the top), most connections are blue. In the patient with MCI (at the middle), most connections are red and green. In the patient with AD (at the bottom), most connections are either absent or green. .

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBrainCluster AnalysisCognitive DysfunctionDecision Making, Computer-AssistedElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalSensitivity and SpecificityAlzheimer’s diseaseClique networksCliquesColored networksConnection coefficientConversion coefficientElectroencephalogramsMild cognitive impairmentNetwork analysisNetwork motifs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.