Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300959›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2020

The Health Care Providers' Perspectives on End-of-Life Patients' Sense of Dignity. A Comparison Among Four Different Professionals' Categories.

Andrea Bovero, Chiara Tosi, Rossana Botto, Alessandra Cito, Valentina Malerba, Valentina Molfetta, Valentina Ieraci, Riccardo Torta

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Andrea BoveroClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy. abovero@cittadellasalute.to.it.ORCID 0000-0001-5728-9907
Chiara TosiClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Rossana BottoClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Alessandra CitoClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Valentina MalerbaClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Valentina MolfettaClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Valentina IeraciClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo TortaClinical Psychology and Psycho-Oncology Unit, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, "Città della Salute e della Scienza" Hospital, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The studies on terminally ill patients' dignity as perceived by health care providers (HCPs) in palliative care are growing. The comparison of different HCPs' perspectives in particular is necessary to explore how HCPs perceive patients' dignity in order to promote reflection on this core issue. This study aimed to investigate the perspectives on end-of-life patients' sense of dignity among four different categories of professionals: nurse assistants, nurses, psychologists, and physicians. A sample of 306 HCPs completed the Patient Dignity Inventory-Italian Version (PDI-IT) adapted for them and an ad hoc semi-structured written interview. Their responses were then analyzed using frequencies of the answers to the PDI-IT, a multivariate analysis of variance, Pearson's correlation index, t tests, and content analysis. All HCPs scored the relevance to the dignity-related physical aspects highly, followed by the psychological distress. Nurse assistants and nurses provided higher scores on the psychological and existential and spiritual PDI subscales than the other HCP groups. The social sphere was evaluated as the least salient for the patients' sense of dignity. Physicians who attended a course on dignity considered the psychological and existential dignity dimensions more. Differences in role and expertise could lead to different HCPs' perspectives on dignity, while the multidisciplinary work could favor their aligning. Therefore, it is essential to encourage HCPs' communicative exchange and reflective awareness through training, i.e., courses, seminars, and focus groups. These developments could promote increasingly adequate patient-centered care.

Indexed as

PersonhoodRespectAdultAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to DeathFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CareSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminally IllYoung AdultCancerDignityEnd-of-life patientsHealth care providersPalliative care

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.