Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300865›Full record

ReviewJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2019

The Cataglyphis Mahrèsienne: 50 years of Cataglyphis research at Mahrès.

Rüdiger Wehner

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rüdiger WehnerInstitute of Brain Research, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. rwehner@zool.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0761-2830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Every year since 1969, research groups from Zürich have spent the summer months in the barren sandy areas around the Tunisian village Mahrès to study the navigational behaviour of Cataglyphis desert ants, its sensory underpinnings, and ecophysiological settings. From the 1990s onwards, researchers from other countries were invited to join the Zürich group, so that Cataglyphis increasingly advanced to become a model organism for the study of animal navigation. Its cockpit became the focus of a dynamic research system, an 'epistemic thing', as modern parlance in the philosophy of science has it. Investigations aimed at the ants' compasses and odometers, at path integration, view-based landmark guidance, and how information from these various navigational routines is combined in computing the courses to steer. In this multifaceted work, the researchers' familiarity with the site, with Mahrès, and its local geographical and historical conditions, has been essential. The essay briefly retraces the historical development of this research system. After the system had been firmly established at the North African Mahrès site, it was extended to the ecological equivalents of Cataglyphis in other true deserts of the world, to Ocymyrmex in the Namib Desert of southern Africa, and to Melophorus in central Australia.

Indexed as

AntsSpatial NavigationAnimalsDesert ClimateHoming BehaviorTunisiaC ataglyphisInsect navigationMahrèsMelophorusOcymyrmex

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.