Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300845›Full record

Trial reportDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2019

[Macular pucker surgery with and without delamination of the internal limiting membrane-a prospective randomized study].

M W Storch, M H Khattab, P Lauermann, C Krüger, U Ritzau-Tondrow, R Staudenmaier, J Callizo, H Hoerauf

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M W StorchAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland. marcus.storch@med.uni-goettingen.de.
M H KhattabAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
P LauermannAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
C KrügerAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
U Ritzau-TondrowAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
R StaudenmaierAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
J CallizoAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
H HoeraufAugenklinik, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075, Göttingen, Deutschland.
Universitätsmedizin Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is evidence that additional internal limiting membrane (ILM) removal reduces the recurrence rate after pucker surgery with a similar functional outcome. On the other hand, morphological changes of the inner retinal layers after ILM peeling have been described. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term data after vitrectomy with and without ILM delamination in order to uncover possible differences in morphological and functional results.

methodsIn a prospective study of 32 patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane, 16 patients were randomized into each of 2 groups. Both groups underwent pars plana vitrectomy (ppV) with peeling of the epiretinal membrane. In group 1 no forced additional peeling of the ILM was performed and in group 2 the ILM or ILM residues were additionally removed after staining. The investigated parameters were visual acuity, central retinal thickness (CRT) in optical coherence tomography (OCT), metamorphopsia and surgical complications. The time points of the examinations were directly preoperative, after 1, 3 and 6 months and partly 8.4 years postoperatively.

resultsIn group 1 (n = 15) the preoperative mean visual acuity improved from 0.54 logMAR to 0.38 logMAR after 6 months postoperatively (n = 13). Of this group 6 patients could be examined in the long-term course and the visual acuity improved further to 0.32 logMAR after 8 years. The CRT decreased from 473 µm preoperatively to 235 µm in the long-term interval. In group 2 (n = 15) the mean visual acuity preoperatively was 0.47 logMAR and improved 6 months postoperatively (n = 13) to 0.38 logMAR and in the long-term examination (n = 5) to 0.1 logMAR. The CRT in this group decreased from 417 µm preoperatively to 278 µm in the long-term interval. In group 1 one recurrence occurred in the follow-up period, in group 2 none.

conclusionThe study showed that there was no significant difference in visual acuity and CRT between the two groups neither after 6 months nor after 8 years of follow-up. The observed recurrence in the group without ILM delamination underlines the assumption that additional ILM peeling could reduce the recurrence rate.

Indexed as

Epiretinal MembraneBasement MembraneHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTomography, Optical CoherenceTreatment OutcomeVitrectomyEpiretinal membraneILMMaculaPeelingRetinal thickness

Identifiers

PMID31300845
OpenAlexW2956960867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.