Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300825›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2019

Clinical trial cohort selection based on multi-level rule-based natural language processing system.

Long Chen, Yu Gu, Xin Ji, Chao Lou, Zhiyong Sun, Haodan Li, Yuan Gao, Yang Huang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence for optimizing recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. LeafAI: query generator for clinical cohort discovery rivaling a human programmer.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Article
  9. A case study in applying artificial intelligence-based named entity recognition to develop an automated ophthalmic disease registry.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2023
    Article
  10. Named Entity Recognition and Normalization for Alzheimer's Disease Eligibility Criteria.Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cohort selection for clinical trials: n2c2 2018 shared task track 1.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Long ChenMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Yu GuMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Xin JiMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Chao LouMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Zhiyong SunMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Haodan LiMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Yuan GaoMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.
Yang HuangMed Data Quest, Inc, La Jolla, California, USA.

Funding

National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2): Challenges in Natural Language Processing for Clinical NarrativesR13LM013127 · NLM · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2019 to 2023
$100k
Challenges in Natural Language Processing in Clinical TextR13LM011411 · NLM · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT ALBANY · PI UZUNER, OZLEM · 2012 to 2016
$98k
NLM NIH HHS R13 LM011411NLM NIH HHS R13 LM013127
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIdentifying patients who meet selection criteria for clinical trials is typically challenging and time-consuming. In this article, we describe our clinical natural language processing (NLP) system to automatically assess patients' eligibility based on their longitudinal medical records. This work was part of the 2018 National NLP Clinical Challenges (n2c2) Shared-Task and Workshop on Cohort Selection for Clinical Trials. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe authors developed an integrated rule-based clinical NLP system which employs a generic rule-based framework plugged in with lexical-, syntactic- and meta-level, task-specific knowledge inputs. In addition, the authors also implemented and evaluated a general clinical NLP (cNLP) system which is built with the Unified Medical Language System and Unstructured Information Management Architecture. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The systems were evaluated as part of the 2018 n2c2-1 challenge, and authors' rule-based system obtained an F-measure of 0.9028, ranking fourth at the challenge and had less than 1% difference from the best system. While the general cNLP system didn't achieve performance as good as the rule-based system, it did establish its own advantages and potential in extracting clinical concepts.

conclusionOur results indicate that a well-designed rule-based clinical NLP system is capable of achieving good performance on cohort selection even with a small training data set. In addition, the investigation of a Unified Medical Language System-based general cNLP system suggests that a hybrid system combining these 2 approaches is promising to surpass the state-of-the-art performance.

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingPatient SelectionClinical Trials as TopicData MiningDeep LearningHumansNeural Networks, Computerclinical natural language processingclinical trialcohort selectionrule-based systemUMLS

Identifiers

PMID31300825
PMCPMC7647235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.