ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2019
Molecular characteristics and therapeutic vulnerabilities across paediatric solid tumours.
Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
86 citing papers in PubMed, 155 citations in OpenAlex.
- The ITCC-P4 PDX Platform Enables Preclinical Testing of Pediatric Cancers.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy for solid tumors in pediatric patients: current breakthroughs, dilemmas, and strategies.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Translational perspectives on immunotherapy targets, germline syndromes, and novel fusions.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Establishing a Multicenter Personalized Medicine Program in Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer in Spain: The SEHOP-PENCIL Project.JCO precision oncology · 2026Article
- Interaction Between PRDM14 and CBFA2T2 Supports Pluripotency and Proliferation in Germ Cell Tumors.Cancers · 2026Article
- The landscape of structural variation in pediatric cancer.Cancer cell · 2026Article
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma Burden and Research Productivity: Global Patterns and Disparities, 1990-2021.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Next generation sequencing identifies novel gene alterations with potential prognostic relevance in pediatric cancer: a single-center study.The oncologist · 2026Article
- Modeling pediatric low-grade glioma heterogeneity using human forebrain organoids.Molecular cancer · 2026Article
- Review
- Integrative Genomic Profiling of Pediatric Solid Tumors Reveals Clinically Relevant Variants and Chromosomal Arm Aneuploidies Signatures.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Interpreting cancer genetics through a two-step "evolutionary cascade hypothesis": bridging neutral and selective perspectives.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Third-generation whole-genome sequencing reveals the role of CNTNAP2 as a tumor suppressor gene in high-risk neuroblastomas.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Ethnic Disparities in Glioblastoma Markers: Impact of Chromosome 7 Gain and 10 Loss Alterations on Clinical Survival Outcomes.Oncology research · 2026Article
- Targeted DNA Sequencing for Tailored Therapies in Children with Extracranial Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- RBM39 degrader invigorates innate immunity to eradicate neuroblastoma despite cancer cell plasticity.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Melanoma antigens in pediatric medulloblastoma contribute to tumor heterogeneity and species-specificity of group 3 tumors.Acta neuropathologica communications · 2025Article
- Photoactivatable Cyclometalated Ir(III) Compound Penetrates the Blood-Brain Barrier in 3D Spheroidal and Advanced 3D Organoid Models of Inherently Resistant and Aggressive Brain Tumors.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025Article
- Somatic gene delivery faithfully recapitulates a molecular spectrum of high-risk sarcomas.Nature communications · 2025Article
- The landscape of structural variation in pediatric cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The spectrum of tumours arising in childhood is fundamentally different from that seen in adults, and they are known to be divergent from adult malignancies in terms of cellular origins, epidemiology, genetic complexity, driver mutations and underlying mutational processes. Despite the immense knowledge generated through sequencing efforts and functional characterization of identified (epi-)genetic alterations over the past decade, the clinical implications of this knowledge have so far been limited. Novel preclinical platforms such as the European Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer-Paediatric Preclinical Proof-of-Concept Platform and the US-based Pediatric Preclinical Testing Consortium are being developed to try to change this by aiming to recapitulate the extensive heterogeneity of paediatric tumours and thereby, hopefully, improve the ability to predict clinical benefit. Numerous studies have also been established worldwide to provide patients with access to real-time molecular profiling and the possibility of more precise mechanism-of-action-based treatments. In addition to tumour-intrinsic findings and mechanisms, ongoing studies are investigating features such as the immune microenvironment of paediatric tumours in comparison with adult cancers - currently of very timely clinical relevance. However, there is an ongoing need for rigorous preclinical biomarker and target validation to feed into the next generation of molecularly stratified clinical trials. This Review aims to provide a comprehensive state-of-the-art overview of the molecular landscape of paediatric solid tumours, including their underlying genomic alterations and interactions with the microenvironment, complemented with our current understanding of potential therapeutic vulnerabilities and how these can be preclinically tested using more accurate predictive methods. Finally, we provide an outlook on the challenges and opportunities associated with translating this overwhelming scientific progress into real clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.