Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300753›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Imaging axon regeneration within synthetic nerve conduits.

Barbara Fogli, Nikky Corthout, Axelle Kerstens, Frank Bosse, Lars Klimaschewski, Sebastian Munck, Rüdiger Schweigreiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomimicry ofBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Barbara FogliInnsbruck Medical University, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Division of Neuroanatomy, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.
Nikky CorthoutVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research O&N 4, Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Axelle KerstensVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research O&N 4, Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
Frank BosseHeinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Department of Neurology, Molecular Neurobiology Laboratory, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Lars KlimaschewskiInnsbruck Medical University, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Embryology, Division of Neuroanatomy, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3211-0047
Sebastian MunckVIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research O&N 4, Campus Gasthuisberg, 3000, Leuven, Belgium. sebastian.munck@kuleuven.vib.be.
Rüdiger SchweigreiterInnsbruck Medical University, Biocenter, Division of Neurobiochemistry, 6020, Innsbruck, Austria. ruediger.schweigreiter@i-med.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While axons within the central nervous system (CNS) do not regenerate following injury, those in the peripheral nervous system (PNS) do, although not in a clinically satisfactory manner as only a small proportion of axons exhibit long-distance regeneration. Moreover, functional recovery is hampered by excessive axonal sprouting and aberrant reinnervation of target tissue. In order to investigate the mechanisms governing the regrowth of axons following injury, previous studies have used lesion paradigms of peripheral nerves in rat or mouse models, and reagents or cells have been administered to the lesion site through nerve conduits, aiming to improve early-stage regeneration. Morphological analysis of such in vivo experiments has however been limited by the incompatibility of synthetic nerve conduits with existing tissue-clearing and imaging techniques. We present herein a novel experimental approach that allows high-resolution imaging of individual axons within nerve conduits, together with quantitative assessment of fiber growth. We used a GFP-expressing mouse strain in a lesion model of the sciatic nerve to describe a strategy that combines nerve clearing, chemical treatment of chitosan nerve conduits, and long working distance confocal microscopy with image processing and analysis. This novel experimental setup provides a means of documenting axon growth within the actual conduit during the critical initial stage of regeneration. This will greatly facilitate the development and evaluation of treatment regimens to improve axonal regeneration following nerve damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsAxonsBiocompatible MaterialsChitosanFemaleImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceMicroscopy, ConfocalNerve RegenerationOptical ImagingPeripheral Nerve InjuriesProstheses and ImplantsRecovery of FunctionSciatic NerveBiocompatible MaterialsChitosan

Identifiers

PMID31300753
PMCPMC6626049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.