ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2019
The potential of genomics for restoring ecosystems and biodiversity.
Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- AI-guided meta-analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing platforms for trisomy 21 screening: comparative evaluation of cffDNA and fetal cell-based approaches.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Pooled it
- Agriculture affects genetic diversity and functional connectivity in an ecologically flexible West African primate.Heredity · 2026Article
- Restoration Plantings Promote Functional Recovery of Soil Fungi.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Genome-Wide SNP Diversity in Natural and Cultivated Populations Informs Restoration Ecology With Three Calamagrostis Species From the Northwest Territories of Canada.Molecular ecology · 2026Article
- Leveraging Genetic Diversity for Abiotic Stress Tolerance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Restoring soil and sediment microbiomes in the Anthropocene.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial genome of the invasive weed Amaranthus palmeri: structural features, RNA editing, and evolutionary insights.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Omics Technologies in Molecular Biology.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Temporal stability and spatial patterns of genetic diversity in populations of the climate-vulnerable fucoid Scytothalia dorycarpa.Journal of phycology · 2026Article
- Genomic erosion across avian lineages in the context of their evolutionary history.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A genome assembly of the California poppy, Eschscholzia californica.The Journal of heredity · 2026Article
- Soil Microbial Functions Indicate Persistent Agricultural Legacies and Potential Alternative States Following Restoration Plantings.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Population genomic insights into the domestication ofHorticulture research · 2026Article
- Integrative Bioinformatics Approaches in Environmental Biotechnology: A Review.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2026Review
- Integrating Genomic and Climate Data to Design Representative Seed Production Areas: A Pragmatic Workflow for Climate-Adjusted Provenancing.Ecology and evolution · 2026Article
- Whole-Genome Resequencing Reveals the Demographic History and Adaptive Evolution ofEcology and evolution · 2026Article
- High genomic structuring in Euterpe precatoria in the Brazilian Amazônia and new implications for restoration and conservation efforts.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Thermal Tolerance Varies Latitudinally and Broadly Mirrors Genetic Structure in the SeaweedEcology and evolution · 2025Article
- Empowering Regional Conservation: Genetic Diversity Assessments as a Tool for Eelgrass Management.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Standardised Genomic Tool for Conservation Management of the Koala (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Billions of hectares of natural ecosystems have been degraded through human actions. The global community has agreed on targets to halt and reverse these declines, and the restoration sector faces the important but arduous task of implementing programmes to meet these objectives. Existing and emerging genomics tools offer the potential to improve the odds of achieving these targets. These tools include population genomics that can improve seed sourcing, meta-omics that can improve assessment and monitoring of restoration outcomes, and genome editing that can generate novel genotypes for restoring challenging environments. We identify barriers to adopting these tools in a restoration context and emphasize that regulatory and ethical frameworks are required to guide their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31300751What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.