Observational studySpinal cord2019
Factors associated with osteocalcin in men with spinal cord injury: findings from the FRASCI study.
Observational study in Spinal cord, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review of osteokines in spinal cord injury: potential biomarkers during rehabilitation.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
STUDY
designCross-sectional study.
objectiveTo assess the association between clinical and demographic factors, bisphosphonate use, and circulating total osteocalcin levels in men with chronic spinal cord injury.
settingVeteran Affairs Medical Center.
methodsAs part of an epidemiological study assessing SCI-related health conditions, 214 men with chronic spinal cord injury underwent a DXA scan and provided a blood sample and information regarding SCI, medication use, and fracture history. General linear models were used to assess clinical/demographic factors of osteocalcin, and if significant, were included in multivariate model.
resultsWe found that total osteocalcin levels increased 1.0 ng/ml for every kilogram increase in lean mass (p = 0.05) and increased 4.53 ng/ml for every ng/ml increase in C-telopeptide level (p < 0.0001). Osteocalcin levels were greater in people reporting no alcohol consumption compared with drinkers (15.49 ng/ml versus 18.58 ng/ml, p < 0.0002), lower in diabetics compared with nondiabetics (15.23 ng/ml versus 18.92 ng/ml, p = 0.0001), and lower in bisphosphonate users compared with nonusers (15.50 ng/ml versus 18.58 ng/ml, p < 0.03). The association between age and osteocalcin was not significant (p = 0.06). This model explained 58% of the variation in ln osteocalcin levels (model p < 0.0001, r
conclusionsTotal osteocalcin levels vary based on health habits, body composition, comorbid illnesses, and bisphosphonate use in men with chronic spinal cord injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.