Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300656›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Reduction of physiological stress by urban green space in a multisensory virtual experiment.

Marcus Hedblom, Bengt Gunnarsson, Behzad Iravani, Igor Knez, Martin Schaefer, Pontus Thorsson, Johan N Lundström

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 110 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 456 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Testing a New Protocol of Nature-Based Intervention to Enhance Well-Being: A Randomized Control Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Marcus HedblomDepartment of Forest Resource Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden. marcus.hedblom@slu.se.
Bengt GunnarssonDepartment of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Behzad IravaniDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9905-1067
Igor KnezDepartment of Occupational Health Sciences and Psychology, University of Gävle, Gävle, Sweden.
Martin SchaeferDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Pontus ThorssonDivision of Applied Acoustics, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Johan N LundströmDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEChalmers University of Technology · SEStockholm University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversity of Gävle · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although stress is an increasing global health problem in cities, urban green spaces can provide health benefits. There is, however, a lack of understanding of the link between physiological mechanisms and qualities of urban green spaces. Here, we compare the effects of visual stimuli (360 degree virtual photos of an urban environment, forest, and park) to the effects of congruent olfactory stimuli (nature and city odours) and auditory stimuli (bird songs and noise) on physiological stress recovery. Participants (N = 154) were pseudo-randomised into participating in one of the three environments and subsequently exposed to stress (operationalised by skin conductance levels). The park and forest, but not the urban area, provided significant stress reduction. High pleasantness ratings of the environment were linked to low physiological stress responses for olfactory and to some extent for auditory, but not for visual stimuli. This result indicates that olfactory stimuli may be better at facilitating stress reduction than visual stimuli. Currently, urban planners prioritise visual stimuli when planning open green spaces, but urban planners should also consider multisensory qualities.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalVirtual RealityAcoustic StimulationAdultAnimalsBirdsCitiesElectric StimulationFemaleForestsGalvanic Skin ResponseHumansMalePhotic StimulationSkinSkin Physiological Phenomena

Identifiers

PMID31300656
PMCPMC6625985
OpenAlexW2961468220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.