Trial reportBioscience reports2019
Investigation of serum proteome homeostasis during radiation therapy by a quantitative proteomics approach.
Trial report in Bioscience reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Longitudinal plasma nano-proteomics reveals acute systemic responses to radiotherapy and predictive biomarkers of late toxicity.Communications medicine · 2026Article
- Insights into Medication-Induced Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Through the Application of Salivary Proteomics and Bioinformatics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Cross-platform validation of a mouse blood gene signature for quantitative reconstruction of radiation dose.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Age and sex effects across the blood proteome after ionizing radiation exposure can bias biomarker screening and risk assessment.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- MALDI-TOF-MS analysis in low molecular weight serum peptidome biomarkers for NSCLC.Journal of clinical laboratory analysis · 2022Article
- Proteomics of Non-human Primate Plasma after Partial-body Radiation with Minimal Bone Marrow Sparing.Health physics · 2020Article
- Radiation Therapy in Patients With Brain Cancer: Post-proteomics Interpretation.Journal of lasers in medical sciences · 2019Article
- Review of the Terminology Describing Ionizing Radiation-Induced Skin Injury: A Case for Standardization.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of the present study is to analyze the serum proteome of patients receiving Radiation Therapy (RT) at different stages of their treatment to discovery candidate biomarkers of the radiation-induced skin lesions and the molecular pathways underlying the radiation signatures. Six stages of RT treatment were monitored from patients treated because of brain cancer: before starting the treatment, during the treatment (four time points), and at 4 weeks from the last RT dose. Serum samples were analyzed by a proteomics approach based on the Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) mass spectrometry (MS). RT induced clear changes in the expression levels of 36 serum proteins. Among these, 25 proteins were down- or up-regulated significantly before the emergence of skin lesions. Some of these were still deregulated after the completion of the treatment. Few days before the appearance of the skin lesions, the levels of some proteins involved in the wound healing processes were down-regulated. The pathway analysis indicated that after partial body irradiation, the expression levels of proteins functionally involved in the acute inflammatory and immune response, lipoprotein process and blood coagulation, were deregulated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.