Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300509›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Identifying mental health and substance use disorders using emergency department and hospital records: a population-based retrospective cohort study of diagnostic concordance and disease attribution.

Linwei Wang, Fahmida Homayra, Lindsay A Pearce, Dimitra Panagiotoglou, Rachael McKendry, Rolando Barrios, Craig Mitton, Bohdan Nosyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Linwei WangEpidemiology and Population Health Unit, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Fahmida HomayraEpidemiology and Population Health Unit, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Lindsay A PearceEpidemiology and Population Health Unit, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Dimitra PanagiotoglouEpidemiology and Population Health Unit, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rachael McKendryVancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Rolando BarriosVancouver Coastal Health Authority, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Craig MittonCentre for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Bohdan NosykEpidemiology and Population Health Unit, British Columbia Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2513-3718
AIDS Vancouver · CAVancouver Coastal Health · CASimon Fraser University · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

CIHR GIR-145128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAdministrative data are increasingly being used for surveillance and monitoring of mental health and substance use disorders (MHSUD) across Canada. However, the validity of the diagnostic codes specific to MHSUD is unknown in emergency departments (EDs). Our objective was to determine the concordance, and individual-level and hospital-level factors associated with concordance, between diagnosis codes assigned in ED and at discharge from hospital for MHSUD-related conditions.

designPopulation-based retrospective cohort study.

settingEDs and hospitals within Vancouver Coastal Health Authority (VCH), British Columbia, Canada.

participants16 926 individuals who were admitted into a VCH hospital following an ED visit from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2017, contributing to 48 116 pairs of ED and hospital discharge diagnoses. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: We examined concordance in identifying MHSUD between the primary discharge diagnosis codes based on the International Statistical Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions (Canada) assigned in the ED and those assigned in the hospital among all ED visits resulting in a hospital admission. We calculated the percent overall agreement, positive agreement, negative agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient. We performed multiple regression analyses to identify factors independently associated with discordance.

resultsWe found a high level of concordance for broad categories of MH conditions (overall agreement=0.89, positive agreement=0.74 and kappa=0.67), and a fair level of concordance for SUDs (overall agreement=0.89, positive agreement=0.31 and kappa=0.27). SUDs were less likely to be indicated as the primary cause in ED as opposed to in hospital (3.8% vs 11.7%). In multiple regression analyses, ED visits occurring during holidays, weekends and overnight (21:00-8:59 hours) were associated with increased odds of discordance in identifying MH conditions (adjusted OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.93; 1.27, 95% CI 1.16 to 1.40; 1.30, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.42, respectively).

conclusionsED data could be used to improve surveillance and monitoring of MHSUD. Future efforts are needed to improve screening for individuals with MHSUD and subsequently connect them to treatment and follow-up care.

Indexed as

AdultAgedEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHospital RecordsHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSubstance-Related DisordersYoung Adultacute health carediagnostic codesmental healthsubstance usesurveillance and monitoringvalidation study

Identifiers

PMID31300509
PMCPMC6629422
OpenAlexW2959754546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.