Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300481›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019

Joint Use of Genome, Pedigree, and Their Interaction with Environment for Predicting the Performance of Wheat Lines in New Environments.

Réka Howard, Daniel Gianola, Osval Montesinos-López, Philomin Juliana, Ravi Singh, Jesse Poland, Sandesh Shrestha, Paulino Pérez-Rodríguez, José Crossa, Diego Jarquín

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Réka HowardUniversity of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln NE, 68583, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8837-3770
Daniel GianolaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8217-2348
Osval Montesinos-LópezUniversidad de Colima, CP 28040 Colima, México.ORCID 0000-0003-4464-3385
Philomin JulianaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 56130, México.ORCID 0000-0001-6922-0173
Ravi SinghInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 56130, México.
Jesse PolandUSDA-ARS and Dep. of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, 4024 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan KS, 66506, USA, and.ORCID 0000-0002-7856-1399
Sandesh ShresthaUSDA-ARS and Dep. of Plant Pathology, Kansas State University, 4024 Throckmorton Hall, Manhattan KS, 66506, USA, and.
Paulino Pérez-RodríguezColegio de Postgraduados, Montecillos, Edo. de México, CP 56230, México.ORCID 0000-0002-3202-1784
José CrossaInternational Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), Km. 45, Carretera México-Veracruz, El Batán, Texcoco, Edo. de México, CP 56130, México j.crossa@cgiar.org diego.jarquin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-9429-5855
Diego JarquínUniversity of Nebraska - Lincoln, Lincoln NE, 68583, USA j.crossa@cgiar.org diego.jarquin@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-5098-2060

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-enabled prediction plays an essential role in wheat breeding because it has the potential to increase the rate of genetic gain relative to traditional phenotypic and pedigree-based selection. Since the performance of wheat lines is highly influenced by environmental stimuli, it is important to accurately model the environment and its interaction with genetic factors in prediction models. Arguably, multi-environmental best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) may deliver better prediction performance than single-environment genomic BLUP. We evaluated pedigree and genome-based prediction using 35,403 wheat lines from the Global Wheat Breeding Program of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). We implemented eight statistical models that included genome-wide molecular marker and pedigree information as prediction inputs in two different validation schemes. All models included main effects, but some considered interactions between the different types of pedigree and genomic covariates via Hadamard products of similarity kernels. Pedigree models always gave better prediction of new lines in observed environments than genome-based models when only main effects were fitted. However, for all traits, the highest predictive abilities were obtained when interactions between pedigree, genomes, and environments were included. When new lines were predicted in unobserved environments, in almost all trait/year combinations, the marker main-effects model was the best. These results provide strong evidence that the different sources of genetic information (molecular markers and pedigree) are not equally useful at different stages of the breeding pipelines, and can be employed differentially to improve the design and prediction of the outcome of future breeding programs.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantModels, GeneticGene-Environment InteractionGenetic MarkersPhenotypePlant BreedingRandom AllocationReproducibility of ResultsTriticumGenetic MarkersCIMMYT wheat evaluation trialsgenome-enabled predictiongenomic × environment interactiongenomic × pedigree × environment interactionGenomic Prediction, GenPred, Shared Data Resourcespedigree-enabled predictionpedigree × environment interaction

Identifiers

PMID31300481
PMCPMC6723131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.