ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2019
Joint Use of Genome, Pedigree, and Their Interaction with Environment for Predicting the Performance of Wheat Lines in New Environments.
Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genotyping analysis of over 130,000 CIMMYT bread wheat breeding lines: A decade-long effort in optimizing wheat genotyping.The plant genome · 2025Article
- Enhancing wheat genomic prediction by a hybrid kernel approach.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Machine learning for genomic and pedigree prediction in sugarcane.The plant genome · 2024Article
- Comparing artificial-intelligence techniques with state-of-the-art parametric prediction models for predicting soybean traits.The plant genome · 2023Article
- Sparse kernel models provide optimization of training set design for genomic prediction in multiyear wheat breeding data.The plant genome · 2022Article
- Environment-specific genomic prediction ability in maize using environmental covariates depends on environmental similarity to training data.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Optimizing predictions in IRRI's rice drought breeding program by leveraging 17 years of historical data and pedigree information.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Crop genomic selection with deep learning and environmental data: A survey.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2022Review
- The importance of dominance and genotype-by-environment interactions on grain yield variation in a large-scale public cooperative maize experiment.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2021Article
- GPTransformer: A Transformer-Based Deep Learning Method for Predicting Fusarium Related Traits in Barley.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Heterosis and Hybrid Crop Breeding: A Multidisciplinary Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Genomic Selection Using Pedigree and Marker-by-Environment Interaction for Barley Seed Quality Traits From Two Commercial Breeding Programs.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
- Genomic Selection for Grain Yield in the CIMMYT Wheat Breeding Program-Status and Perspectives.Frontiers in plant science · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genome-enabled prediction plays an essential role in wheat breeding because it has the potential to increase the rate of genetic gain relative to traditional phenotypic and pedigree-based selection. Since the performance of wheat lines is highly influenced by environmental stimuli, it is important to accurately model the environment and its interaction with genetic factors in prediction models. Arguably, multi-environmental best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) may deliver better prediction performance than single-environment genomic BLUP. We evaluated pedigree and genome-based prediction using 35,403 wheat lines from the Global Wheat Breeding Program of the International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT). We implemented eight statistical models that included genome-wide molecular marker and pedigree information as prediction inputs in two different validation schemes. All models included main effects, but some considered interactions between the different types of pedigree and genomic covariates via Hadamard products of similarity kernels. Pedigree models always gave better prediction of new lines in observed environments than genome-based models when only main effects were fitted. However, for all traits, the highest predictive abilities were obtained when interactions between pedigree, genomes, and environments were included. When new lines were predicted in unobserved environments, in almost all trait/year combinations, the marker main-effects model was the best. These results provide strong evidence that the different sources of genetic information (molecular markers and pedigree) are not equally useful at different stages of the breeding pipelines, and can be employed differentially to improve the design and prediction of the outcome of future breeding programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.