Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31300452›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2019

Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling in Small-Cell Lung Cancer Identifies Potentially Targetable Alterations.

Siddhartha Devarakonda, Sumithra Sankararaman, Brett H Herzog, Kathryn A Gold, Saiama N Waqar, Jeffrey P Ward, Victoria M Raymond, Richard B Lanman, Aadel A Chaudhuri, Taofeek K Owonikoko and 5 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Early ctDNA Dynamics Inform First-Line Therapy in Patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. State of the art in treatment of small cell lung cancer.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Siddhartha DevarakondaWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Sumithra SankararamanWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Brett H HerzogWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Kathryn A GoldUniversity of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5165-4424
Saiama N WaqarWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Jeffrey P WardWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Victoria M RaymondGuardant Health Inc., Redwood, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-0981
Richard B LanmanGuardant Health Inc., Redwood, California.ORCID 0000-0001-8122-4329
Aadel A ChaudhuriWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.ORCID 0000-0003-3115-3061
Taofeek K OwonikokoWinship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
Bob T LiMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-8733
John T PoirierMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-9795-5644
Charles M RudinMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-5204-3465
Ramaswamy GovindanWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri.
Daniel MorgenszternWashington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri. danielmorgensztern@wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · USKettering University · USGuardant (United States) · USEmory University · USUniversity of California San Diego · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Washington University Paul Calabresi K12 Career Development Award for Clinical OncologyK12CA167540 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI John F. Dipersio, Ramaswamy Govindan · 2012 to 2026
$11.7M
Determinants of acquired resistance in small cell lung cancerR01CA197936 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI RUDIN, CHARLES M. · 2016 to 2020
$3.1M
Genomic and Functional Identification of Chemotherapy Resistance Mechanisms in Small Cell Lung CancerU01CA231844 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI GOVINDAN, RAMASWAMY, GRIFFITH, OBI L. · 2018 to 2022
$3.1M
Cell-Free Nucleic Acids for Early Treatment Response Assessment of Hepatocellular CancerK08CA238711 · NCI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHAUDHURI, AADEL · 2019 to 2021
$647k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA238711NCI NIH HHS K12 CA167540NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA197936NCI NIH HHS U01 CA231844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with SCLC rarely undergo biopsies at relapse. When pursued, tissue obtained can be inadequate for molecular testing, posing a challenge in identifying potentially targetable alterations in a clinically meaningful time frame. We examined the feasibility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing in identifying potentially targetable alterations in SCLC. EXPERIMENTAL

designctDNA test results were prospectively collected from patients with SCLC between 2014 and 2017 and analyzed. ctDNA profiles of SCLC at diagnosis and relapse were also compared.

resultsA total of 609 samples collected from 564 patients between 2014 and 2017 were analyzed. The median turnaround time for test results was 14 days. Among patients with data on treatment status, there were 61 samples from 59 patients and 219 samples from 206 patients collected at diagnosis and relapse, respectively. The number of mutations or amplifications detected per sample did not differ by treatment status. Potentially targetable alterations in DNA repair, MAPK and PI3K pathways, and genes such as MYC and ARID1A were identifiable through ctDNA testing. Furthermore, our results support that it may be possible to reconstruct the clonal relationship between detected variants through ctDNA testing.

conclusionsPatients with relapsed SCLC rarely undergo biopsies for molecular testing and often require prompt treatment initiation. ctDNA testing is less invasive and capable of identifying alterations in relapsed disease in a clinically meaningful timeframe. ctDNA testing on an expanded gene panel has the potential to advance our knowledge of the mechanisms underlying treatment resistance in SCLC and aid in the development of novel treatment strategies.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA-Binding ProteinsDNA RepairFeasibility StudiesFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansLiquid BiopsyLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedAntineoplastic AgentsARID1A protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNADNA-Binding ProteinsMYC protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID31300452
PMCPMC7373320
OpenAlexW2962196100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.