Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31299966›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2019

EPOCK study protocol: a mixed-methods research program evaluating cancer care coordination nursing occupations in France as a complex intervention.

F Colombani, M Sibé, M Kret, B Quintard, A Ravaud, F Saillour-Glénisson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03350776 (Pilot Observational and Analytic Study of Practices and Organizations Related to Emerging Occupations of Care Coordination in Oncology), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03350776 completednot on this map

Pilot Observational and Analytic Study of Practices and Organizations Related to Emerging Occupations of Care Coordination in Oncology: Modeling the Concept of Care Coordination in Oncology (EPOCK)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, BordeauxRan2018 to 2019Enrolled960ConditionsCare Coordination in OncologyArmsCare coordination
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F ColombaniCentre de Coordination en Cancérologie (3C), CHU de Bordeaux (Bordeaux University Hospital), Groupe hospitalier Saint-André, 1 rue Jean Burguet, F-33000, Bordeaux, France. francoise.colombani@chu-bordeaux.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8925-7053
M SibéEconomie et Management des Organisations de Santé (EMOS), INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
M KretService d'Information médicale, Unité de soutien méthodologique à la recherche clinique (USMR), CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de Santé publique, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
B QuintardFaculté de Psychologie, Laboratoire EA 4136 Handicap, Activité, Cognition, Santé, Université de Bordeaux, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
A RavaudCentre de Coordination en Cancérologie (3C), CHU de Bordeaux (Bordeaux University Hospital), Groupe hospitalier Saint-André, 1 rue Jean Burguet, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
F Saillour-GlénissonEconomie et Management des Organisations de Santé (EMOS), INSERM, ISPED, Centre INSERM U1219-Bordeaux Population Health, F-33000, Bordeaux, France.
Université de Bordeaux · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux · FRInserm · FR

Funding

Health Services Research Grant from the French Ministry of Health (France)- PREPS Program n°PREPS-16-241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFacing the increasing cancer incidence and cancer survivorship, many national strategic cancer plans have identified cancer care coordination as a priority for health service improvement. However, the high variability of practices, the diversity of definitions and underlying concepts increases the existing difficulty to standardise, replicate, transpose and assess care coordination within the French health system context. The EPOCK national study aims at evaluating practices and the working context of hospital-based cancer care coordination nurses, based on a previously designed reference framework for care coordination within the French health system context.

methodsEPOCK is based on a comprehensive evaluation of nursing professions in cancer care coordination, considered as a complex intervention. Phase 1 (theoretical phase) will define and design a theoretical reference framework for care coordination in France through an international literature review, aiming to identify relevant models and all components of the expected framework and a structured consensus method, the Nominal group technique, aiming to select and prioritise the most relevant components already found in the literature review with regard to the French healthcare system; phase 2 (Operational phase) will consist in an in-depth analysis of practices, contexts, perceptions and attitudes related to care coordination occupations by nurses in oncology and all stakeholders (related professionals, patients and their caregivers) through a multicentric cross-sectional mixed-method evaluative study. The observed practices and contexts will be finally compared with the theoretical reference framework using both inductive and deductive approaches. DISCUSSION: This study will result in an evaluation framework identifying key models and key elements relative to cancer care coordination interventions that can be used to guide management of cancer care coordination nursing occupations within the French healthcare system. EPOCK would also assist in public decision-making to identify optimal targets, skills profiles and scope of actions for cancer coordination professions. Finally, EPOCK will describe typology of nurse practices in cancer care coordination and thus obtain precise preliminary information essential for drafting a medico-economic evaluation study of these new nursing professions' impact.

trial registrationClinicaltrial.gov registration: NCT03350776 , 11/22/2017.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CareCross-Sectional StudiesFranceHealth Services ResearchHumansNeoplasmsOncology NursingQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSurveys and QuestionnairesCare coordinationContinuity of patient careModelsNeoplasmsNursesOrganisational contextPatient care managementPatient-centered careTheoretical framework

Identifiers

PMID31299966
PMCPMC6626323
OpenAlexW2959268033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.